Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar 9;7(3):22.
doi: 10.3390/ani7030022.

Of Fur, Feather, and Fin: Human's Use and Concern for Non-Human Species

Affiliations

Of Fur, Feather, and Fin: Human's Use and Concern for Non-Human Species

Elizabeth Byrd et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

The public's concern for animal welfare is evolving and it is important to consider factors that are related to concern for animals and their use by humans. An online survey of 825 U.S. residents was conducted. Relationships between approval of animal uses and stated concern for animal welfare were examined. More than 90% of respondents reported that using animals for egg production, service or therapy, pets, and milk production was acceptable to them. Respondents who were younger or reported being female less frequently found most uses acceptable than older or male respondents. Half of respondents reported concern for the welfare of bison while 40% or more stated concern for the welfare of elk, beef cattle, and dairy cattle. Respondents who stated they were concerned for the welfare of dairy cattle less frequently reported accepting using animals for meat production, livestock shows, and hunting. Thus, self-reported concern for animal species and acceptance of the use of animals were related in some instances. A better understanding of the factors related to acceptance of animal uses and concern for animal welfare will help animal-related industries and wildlife agencies develop practices that are consistent with public attitudes.

Keywords: animal use; animal welfare; livestock; perceptions; pets.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Driscoll J.W. Attitudes toward animal use. Anthrozoös. 1992;5:32–39. doi: 10.2752/089279392787011575. - DOI
    1. Maher B. Free Pigs from the Abusive Crates, 2014. [(accessed on 12 December 2016)]. Available online: http//www.nytimes.com/2014/10/18/opinion/free-pigs-from-the-abusive-crat....
    1. Kroger Kroger Announces Goal of 100% Cage-Free Eggs by 2025, 2016. [(accessed on 3 March 2017)]. Available online: http//www.thekrogerco.com/docs/statements-policies/kroger-statement-on-c....
    1. Baker B. Maine Puts Bear Baiting on the Nov. Ballot, 2014. [(accessed on 3 March 2017)]. Available online: http//www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2014/08/30/maine-bear-hunt-challenged-ba....
    1. Perry T. Amid “Blackfish” Backlash, SeaWorld to Expand Orca Environments, 2014. [(accessed on 3 March 2017)]. Available online: http//www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-seaworld-orca-plans-20140814-....

LinkOut - more resources