Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar 10;12(1):50.
doi: 10.1186/s13023-017-0601-9.

Recommendations from the European Working Group for Value Assessment and Funding Processes in Rare Diseases (ORPH-VAL)

Affiliations

Recommendations from the European Working Group for Value Assessment and Funding Processes in Rare Diseases (ORPH-VAL)

Lieven Annemans et al. Orphanet J Rare Dis. .

Abstract

Rare diseases are an important public health issue with high unmet need. The introduction of the EU Regulation on orphan medicinal products (OMP) has been successful in stimulating investment in the research and development of OMPs. Despite this advancement, patients do not have universal access to these new medicines. There are many factors that affect OMP uptake, but one of the most important is the difficulty of making pricing and reimbursement (P&R) decisions in rare diseases. Until now, there has been little consensus on the most appropriate assessment criteria, perspective or appraisal process. This paper proposes nine principles to help improve the consistency of OMP P&R assessment in Europe and ensure that value assessment, pricing and funding processes reflect the specificities of rare diseases and contribute to both the sustainability of healthcare systems and the sustainability of innovation in this field. These recommendations are the output of the European Working Group for Value Assessment and Funding Processes in Rare Diseases (ORPH-VAL), a collaboration between rare disease experts, patient representatives, academics, health technology assessment (HTA) practitioners, politicians and industry representatives. ORPH-VAL reached its recommendations through careful consideration of existing OMP P&R literature and through a wide consultation with expert stakeholders, including payers, regulators and patients. The principles cover four areas: OMP decision criteria, OMP decision process, OMP sustainable funding systems and European co-ordination. This paper also presents a guide to the core elements of value relevant to OMPs that should be consistently considered in all OMP appraisals. The principles outlined in this paper may be helpful in drawing together an emerging consensus on this topic and identifying areas where consistency in payer approach could be achievable and beneficial. All stakeholders have an obligation to work together to ensure that the promise of OMP's is realised.

Keywords: Guidelines; Health technology assessment; Orphan medicinal products; Pricing and reimbursement; Rare diseases; Value assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Process through which the Principles were developed. MoCA-OMP: mechanism of coordinated access to orphan medicinal products; MCDA: multi-criteria decision analysis; P&R: Pricing and reimbursement; TC: teleconference
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Summary of Principles for value assessment and funding processes in rare diseases
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Guide to core elements of value relevant to pricing and reimbursement decisions in rare diseases. See Additional file 1 for glossary of terms on the core elements of value

References

    1. EUCERD (The European Union Committee of Experts on Rare Diseases) Recommendation of the European Union committee of experts on rare diseases to the European Commission and the Member States on improving informed decisions based on the clinical added value of orphan medicinal products (CAVOMP) information flow. 2012.
    1. European Commission . Inventory of Union and Member State incentives to support research into, and the development and availability of, orphan medicinal products. 2015.
    1. European Commission . Orphan medicinal products. 2016.
    1. Dupont A, Van Wilder P. Access to orphan drugs despite poor quality of clinical evidence. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;71(4):488–496. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03877.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gutierrez L, Patris J, Hutchings A, Cowell W. Principles for consistent value assessment and sustainable funding of orphan drugs in Europe. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2015;10:53. doi: 10.1186/s13023-015-0269-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types