Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar;36(1):77-90.
doi: 10.1007/s10555-017-9661-5.

Identification, genetic testing, and management of hereditary melanoma

Affiliations

Identification, genetic testing, and management of hereditary melanoma

Sancy A Leachman et al. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Several distinct melanoma syndromes have been defined, and genetic tests are available for the associated causative genes. Guidelines for melanoma genetic testing have been published as an informal "rule of twos and threes," but these guidelines apply to CDKN2A testing and are not intended for the more recently described non-CDKN2A melanoma syndromes. In order to develop an approach for the full spectrum of hereditary melanoma patients, we have separated melanoma syndromes into two types: "melanoma dominant" and "melanoma subordinate." Syndromes in which melanoma is a predominant cancer type are considered melanoma dominant, although other cancers, such as mesothelioma or pancreatic cancers, may also be observed. These syndromes are associated with defects in CDKN2A, CDK4, BAP1, MITF, and POT1. Melanoma-subordinate syndromes have an increased but lower risk of melanoma than that of other cancer(s) seen in the syndrome, such as breast and ovarian cancer or Cowden syndrome. Many of these melanoma-subordinate syndromes are associated with well-established predisposition genes (e.g., BRCA1/2, PTEN). It is likely that these predisposition genes are responsible for the increased susceptibility to melanoma as well but with lower penetrance than that observed for the dominant cancer(s) in those syndromes. In this review, we describe our extension of the "rule of twos and threes" for melanoma genetic testing. This algorithm incorporates an understanding of the spectrum of cancers and genes seen in association with melanoma to create a more comprehensive and tailored approach to genetic testing.

Keywords: Gene panel sequencing; Genetic syndromes; Genetic testing; Inherited cancer risk; Melanoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of genetic testing in melanoma-dominant and melanoma-subordinate cancer syndromes. This algorithm details navigation of genetic testing based on family history. It is also an option to proceed directly to panel testing. FAMMM familial atypical multiple mole melanoma syndrome. The left side of the figure depicts syndromes that contain melanoma as the dominant cancer in the syndrome whereas the right side of the figure depicts other cancer syndromes that contain melanoma as a subordinate cancer
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Tailored genetic testing recommendations. If a patient has a score of 3 or greater, then a genetic panel should be tailored to the family history. Genes listed in gray should be tested in the research realm after counseling the patient on the risks and benefits

References

    1. Ransohoff KJ, Jaju PD, Tang JY, Carbone M, Leachman S, Sarin KY. Familial skin cancer syndromes increased melanoma risk. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2016;74(3):423–434. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.09.070. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Read J, Wadt KAW, Hayward NK. Melanoma genetics. Journal of Medical Genetics. 2015;53:1–14. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2015-103150. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goldstein AM, Chan M, Harland M, Hayward NK, Demenais F, Bishop DT, et al. Features associated with germline CDKN2A mutations: a GenoMEL study of melanoma-prone families from three continents. Journal of Medical Genetics. 2007;44(2):99–106. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2006.043802. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Taber JM, Aspinwall LG, Stump TK, Kohlmann W, Champine M, Leachman SA. Genetic test reporting enhances understanding of risk information and acceptance of prevention recommendations compared to family history-based counseling alone. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2015;38(5):740–753. doi: 10.1007/s10865-015-9648-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aspinwall LG, Taber JM, Kohlmann W, Leaf SL, Leachman SA. Unaffected family members report improvements in daily routine sun-protection 2 years following melanoma genetic testing. Genetics in Medicine. 2014;16:356–372. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.37. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types