Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jun;13(2):135-145.
doi: 10.1007/s13181-017-0609-5. Epub 2017 Mar 10.

Should We Be Using the Poisoning Severity Score?

Evan S Schwarz  1 , Kathryn T Kopec  2 , Timothy J Wiegand  3 , Paul M Wax  4 , Jeffrey Brent  5
Affiliations
Review

Should We Be Using the Poisoning Severity Score?

Evan S Schwarz et al. J Med Toxicol. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the existence of a number of severity-of-illness classifications for other areas of medicine, toxicology research lacks a well-accepted method for assessing the severity of poisoning. The Poisoning Severity Score (PSS) was developed in the 1990s in Europe as a scoring system for poisonings reported to a poison center in order to describe a patient's most severe symptomatology. We reviewed the literature to describe how the PSS is utilized and describe its limitations.

Discussion: We searched the medical literature in all languages using PUBMED, EMBASE, and SCOPUS from inception through August 2013 using predefined search terms. Out of 204 eligible publications, 40 met our criteria for inclusion in this review. There has been a paucity of published studies from North America that used the PSS. In some cases, the PSS was misapplied or modified from standard scoring, making a bottom line appraisal of the validity or reliability of the original version of the instrument challenging. The PSS has several subjective criteria, is time consuming to score, and is likely to be of little use with some types of poisonings, limiting its clinical utility.

Conclusion: The PSS was developed as a tool to document encounters with poisoned patients. However, it is used infrequently and, when applied, has been misused or modified from its original form. In its current form, it has limited clinical utility and likely cannot be broadly applied to many exposures due to their unique clinical circumstances. With better global collaboration among medical toxicologists, it is possible that a modified score could be developed for use clinically or as a research instrument.

Keywords: Poisoning; Poisoning Severity Score; Severity score; Toxic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Sources of Funding

None

Conflicts of Interest

None

Comment in

References

    1. Mowry JB, Spyker DA, Brooks DE, McMillan N, Schauben JL. 2014 annual report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers’ National Poison Data System (NPDS): 32nd annual report. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2015;53:962–1146. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2015.1102927. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mathers C, Boerma T, Fat DM. The global burden of disease: 2004 update. Department of Health Statistics and Informatics in the Information, Evidence and Research Cluster of WHO. 2008. World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/GBD_report_2004updat.... Accessed April 2, 2014
    1. Barlow P. A practical review of the Glasgow Coma Scale and Score. Surgeon. 2012;10:114–119. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2011.12.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Steele A, Bocconi GA, Oggioni R, Tulli G. Scoring systems in intensive care. Curr Anaesth Crit Care. 1998;9:8–15. doi: 10.1016/S0953-7112(98)80063-X. - DOI
    1. Akdur O, Durukan P, Ozkan S, Avsarogullari L, Vardar A, Kavalci C, Ikizeceli I. Poisoning severity score, Glasgow coma scale, corrected QT interval in acute organophosphate poisoning. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2010;29:419–425. doi: 10.1177/0960327110364640. - DOI - PubMed