Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jun;14(3):83-92.
doi: 10.1007/s11904-017-0349-9.

Monitoring HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorder Using Screenings: a Critical Review Including Guidelines for Clinical and Research Use

Affiliations
Review

Monitoring HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorder Using Screenings: a Critical Review Including Guidelines for Clinical and Research Use

Jody Kamminga et al. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

Screening tools to identify HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND) are primarily devised to detect cognitive impairment on a single occasion. With the chronicity of HIV infection and the risk of HAND developing or progressing despite viral control, it may be pertinent to repeat HAND screening at more than one time point. Despite this, there are limited data on longitudinal use of such screening tools, particularly with regard to the role of practice effects. Additionally, no guidelines currently exist on the timeframe between testing intervals, or recommendation of the magnitude of baseline impairment that warrants follow-up testing. The aim of the current paper was to review existing evidence for longitudinal validity of HAND screening tools. Only those HAND screening tools previously found to have high cross-sectional criterion validity were included. Preliminary recommendations for clinical use and future research are proposed including in international settings.

Keywords: Aids; Cognitive screen; Computerized screen; HIV; HIV dementia scale; Hand; International settings; Longitudinal studies; Neuropsychology; Reliability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Neurology. 2014 Jun 10;82(23):2055-62 - PubMed
    1. Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1190-200 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2008 Jan;30(1):83-90 - PubMed
    1. Neuropsychologia. 2015 Aug;75:411-9 - PubMed
    1. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2006 Feb;21(2):185-94 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources