Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul;130(7):862.e15-862.e23.
doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.02.012. Epub 2017 Mar 9.

Time to Clinically Relevant Fracture Risk Scores in Postmenopausal Women

Affiliations

Time to Clinically Relevant Fracture Risk Scores in Postmenopausal Women

Margaret L Gourlay et al. Am J Med. 2017 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Clinical practice guidelines recommend use of fracture risk scores for screening and pharmacologic treatment decisions. The timing of occurrence of treatment-level (according to 2014 National Osteoporosis Foundation guidelines) or screening-level (according to 2011 US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines) fracture risk scores has not been estimated in postmenopausal women.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective competing risk analysis of new occurrence of treatment-level and screening-level fracture risk scores in postmenopausal women aged 50 years and older, prior to receipt of pharmacologic treatment and prior to first hip or clinical vertebral fracture.

Results: In 54,280 postmenopausal women aged 50 to 64 years without a bone mineral density test, the time for 10% to develop a treatment-level FRAX score could not be estimated accurately because of rare incidence of treatment-level scores. In 6096 women who had FRAX scores calculated with bone mineral density, the estimated unadjusted time to treatment-level FRAX ranged from 7.6 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.6-8.7) for those aged 65 to 69, to 5.1 years (95% CI, 3.5-7.5) for those aged 75 to 79 at baseline. Of 17,967 women aged 50 to 64 with a screening-level FRAX at baseline, 100 (0.6%) experienced a hip or clinical vertebral fracture by age 65 years.

Conclusions: Postmenopausal women with sub-threshold fracture risk scores at baseline were unlikely to develop a treatment-level FRAX score between ages 50 and 64 years. After age 65, the increased incidence of treatment-level fracture risk scores, osteoporosis, and major osteoporotic fracture supports more frequent consideration of FRAX and bone mineral density testing.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00000611.

Keywords: Bone density; Fractures; Menopausal; Osteoporosis/epidemiology; Risk assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest/disclosures: No conflicts of interest were reported for the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Study population for primary analyses of time to treatment-level or screening-level FRAX risk score
Of the 111,556 women who did not have a DXA bone density test, 57,276 were excluded, including those who had a past hip or clinical vertebral fracture or antifracture treatment (bisphosphonate or calcitonin) at their first study examination, or who did not have adequate data for a FRAX score calculation at two or more examinations, or one FRAX score and subsequent development of a competing risk. In the cohort of 54,280 women with adequate data for a FRAX-without-BMD score prior to censoring, two transitions were studied: transition to treatment-level FRAX score (10-year estimated risk of major osteoporotic fracture ≥20% or of hip fracture ≥3%), and transition to screening-level FRAX score (10-year estimated risk of major osteoporotic fracture ≥9.3%). By a similar exclusion process, 6096 eligible participants who had at least one bone mineral density test were identified and were studied for transition to treatment-level FRAX-with-BMD score. The 39,568 women excluded for screening-level or treatment-level FRAX scores at baseline could not participate in the main analysis, but their incidence of hip and clinical vertebral fracture was examined.

References

    1. World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, UK. University of Sheffield; Sheffield, UK: [Accessed December 27, 2016]. FRAX: WHO Fracture Risk Assessment Tool [Internet] Available from http://www.shef.ac.uk/FRAX/
    1. Dawson-Hughes B, Tosteson AN, Melton LJ, 3rd, et al. Implications of absolute fracture risk assessment for osteoporosis practice guidelines in the USA. Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. 2008;19(4):449–458. - PubMed
    1. Tosteson AN, Melton LJ, 3rd, Dawson-Hughes B, et al. Cost-effective osteoporosis treatment thresholds: the United States perspective. Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. 2008;19(4):437–447. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cosman F, de Beur SJ, LeBoff MS, et al. Clinician's Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2014;25(10):2359–2381. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Screening for osteoporosis: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(5):356–364. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data