Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Feb 20;9(1):7030.
doi: 10.4081/or.2017.7030.

Radiographic Evaluation of Common Pediatric Elbow Injuries

Affiliations
Review

Radiographic Evaluation of Common Pediatric Elbow Injuries

Steven F DeFroda et al. Orthop Rev (Pavia). .

Abstract

Normal variations in anatomy in the skeletally immature patient may be mistaken for fracture or injury due to the presence of secondary centers of ossification. Variations in imaging exist from patient to patient based on sex, age, and may even vary from one extremity to the other on the same patient. Despite differences in the appearance of the bony anatomy of the elbow there are certain landmarks and relationships, which can help, distinguish normal from abnormal. We review common radiographic parameters and pitfalls associated in the evaluation of pediatric elbow imaging. We also review common clinical diagnoses in this population.

Keywords: Development; Elbow; Fracture; Pediatrics; Radiographs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Illustration of the pediatric elbow describing the normal appearance of the secondary ossification centers.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
A) Monteggia fracture. White arrow represents ulnar bowing. The radial head is not directed at the capitellum. B) Lateral image more clearly demonstrates the malalignment of the radiocapitellar joint representing an associated posterior radiocapitellar dislocation.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Lateral x-ray of an extension type supracondylar humerus fracture. Note the anterior humeral line (black dotted line) passes far anterior to the capitellum rather than bisecting the anterior two-thirds.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
A) Anteroposterior radiograph showing a lateral condyle fracture (white arrow). B) Lateral radiograph showing the typical posterior fragment associated with a lateral condyle fracture (white arrow).
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
A) Lateral radiograph showing an incarcerated medial epicondyle fracture (white arrow). B) Anteroposterior radiograph radiograph depicting the same (white arrow).
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
A) Anteroposterior radiograph showing a distal humeral physeal separation. Notice both the ulna and radius have translated together so the radial head still points towards the capitellum. B) Lateral x-ray depicting the mechanism of injury with the ulna translating posteriorly (black arrow) to the anterior humeral line (black dotted line) and the radial head maintaining its relationship to the capitellum (white dotted line).

References

    1. Emery KH, Zingula SN, Anton CG, et al. Pediatric elbow fractures: a new angle on an old topic. Pediatr Radiol 2016;46:61-6. - PubMed
    1. Landin LA. Fracture patterns in children. Analysis of 8,682 fractures with special reference to incidence, etiology and secular changes in a Swedish urban population 1950-1979. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1983;202:1-109. - PubMed
    1. Skaggs D, Pershad J. Pediatric elbow trauma. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1997;13:425-34. - PubMed
    1. Nakamura K, Hirachi K, Uchiyama S, et al. Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes after open reduction for missed Monteggia fracture-dislocations in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91:1394-404. - PubMed
    1. Rodgers WB, Waters PM, Hall JE. Chronic Monteggia lesions in children. Complications and results of reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996;78:1322-9. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources