Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2018 Feb;16(2):209-214.
doi: 10.2450/2017.0196-16. Epub 2017 Jan 30.

Use of dabigatran and rivaroxaban in non-valvular atrial fibrillation: one-year follow-up experience in an Italian centre

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Use of dabigatran and rivaroxaban in non-valvular atrial fibrillation: one-year follow-up experience in an Italian centre

Mario Schiavoni et al. Blood Transfus. 2018 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) have been shown to be non-inferior to traditional vitamin K antagonists in preventing stroke and arterial thromboembolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Nevertheless, it is mandatory to record side effects and individual adherence to DOAC treatment.

Materials and methods: In this single-centre experience, patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation were prospectively observed after switching from a vitamin K antagonist to dabigatran or rivaroxaban. The efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the novel treatment, and adherence to it, were evaluated over a period of 1 year. Clinical data were integrated with records of haemorrhagic and non-haemorrhagic complications. All the subjects were given an anonymous self-report questionnaire on the degree of their adherence/satisfaction with the treatment.

Results: Of 196 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (median age, 78.5 years) who switched from a vitamin K antagonist to DOAC, 178 completed the 1-year follow up, of whom 87 were given dabigatran and 91 rivaroxaban. The efficacy of the two DOAC was similar. Patients given dabigatran had a higher frequency (n=32) of non-haemorrhagic complications (OR: 3.3; 95% CI: 1.7-7.8), which occurred earlier (HR: 6.1; 95% CI: 3.0-12.6) than those (n=7) recorded in subjects on rivaroxaban. The degree of satisfaction with therapy was higher among patients on rivaroxaban (mean score 9.1, SD 1.0) than among those on dabigatran (mean score 8.7; SD 0.9; p=0.01).

Discussion: Overall, in this experience, DOAC were shown to be effective, safe alternatives to vitamin K antagonists. Nevertheless, compared with rivaroxaban, dabigatran resulted in a higher rate and earlier occurrence of non-haemorrhagic events, and a lower satisfaction score.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The Authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
VAS questionnaire on adherence/satisfaction with DOAC therapy. VAS: visual analogue scale; DOAC:Direct oral anticoagulants.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cumulative event-free survival in DOAC anticoagulated patients. Kaplan-Meier curve, showing cumulative event-free survival in DOAC anticoagulated patients taking dabigatran (solid line) or rivaroxaban (dotted line). DOAC: direct oral anticoagulants.
Figure 3
Figure 3
VAS adherence/satisfaction scores in patients on dabigatran or rivaroxaban. The numbers of patients with each score are reported above the columns. VAS: visual analogue scale.

Comment in

  • Dabigratan-related acute agranulocytosis.
    Al-Khaffaf A, Frattini F, Sissa C, Mimiola E, Franchini M. Al-Khaffaf A, et al. Blood Transfus. 2019 Mar;17(2):163-164. doi: 10.2450/2019.0237-18. Epub 2019 Jan 21. Blood Transfus. 2019. PMID: 31013250 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hart RG, Pearce LA. Current status of stroke risk stratification in patients with atrial fibrillation. Stroke. 2009;40:2607–10. - PubMed
    1. Wang TJ, Massaro JM, Levy D, et al. A risk score for predicting stroke or death in individuals with new-onset atrial fibrillation in the community. JAMA. 2003;290:1049–56. - PubMed
    1. Suárez Fernández C, Formiga F, Camafort M, et al. Antithrombotic treatment in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: a practical approach. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2015;15:143. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf F, et al. RE-LY steering committee and investigators. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1139–51. - PubMed
    1. Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J the ROCKET AF Steering Committee, for the ROCKET AF Investigators. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:883–91. - PubMed

Publication types