Modified MicroSecure Vitrification: A Safe, Simple and Highly Effective Cryopreservation Procedure for Human Blastocysts
- PMID: 28287560
- PMCID: PMC5407698
- DOI: 10.3791/54871
Modified MicroSecure Vitrification: A Safe, Simple and Highly Effective Cryopreservation Procedure for Human Blastocysts
Abstract
Clinical embryo vitrification evolved with the development of unique vitrification devices in the 21st century and with the misconception that ultra-rapid cooling in an "open" system (i.e., direct LN2 contact) was a necessity to optimize vitrification success. The dogma surrounding the importance of cooling rates led to unsafe practices subject to technical variation and to the creation of vitrification devices that disregarded important quality-control factors (e.g., ease of use, repeatability, reliability, labeling security, and storage safety). Understanding the quality-control flaws of other devices allowed for the development of a safe, secure, repeatable, and reliable µS-VTF method aimed to minimize intra- and inter-technician variation. Equally important, it combined the availability of two existing FDA-compliant devices: 1) a 0.3-mL ionomeric resin embryo straw with internalized, dual-colored, tamper-proof labeling with repeatable weld seal potential; and 2) shortened, commonly-used, 300-µm ID sterile flexipettes to directly load the embryo(s) in order to create a highly-effective global vitrification device. Like other aseptic, closed vitrification systems (e.g., High Security Vitrification (HSV), Rapid-i, and VitriSafe) effectively used in reproductive medicine, microSecure Vitrification (µS-VTF) has proven that it can achieve high post-warming survival and pregnancy outcomes with its attention to simplicity, and reduced technical variation. Although the 0.3-mL embryo straw containing an internal hydrophobic plug was commercially replaced with a standard semen straw possessing cotton-polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) plugs, it maintained its ionomeric resin composition to ensure weld sealing. However, the cotton plugs can wick out the fluid-embryo contents of the flexipettes upon contact. A modified µS-VTF method was adapted to include an additional internal weld seal before the plug on the device loading side. The added technical step to the µS-VTF procedure has not affected its successful application, as high survival rates (> 95%) and pregnancy rates continue today.
Similar articles
-
Validation of microSecure vitrification (μS-VTF) for the effective cryopreservation of human embryos and oocytes.Cryobiology. 2015 Oct;71(2):264-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2015.07.009. Epub 2015 Jul 23. Cryobiology. 2015. PMID: 26210008
-
Blastocyst transfer after aseptic vitrification of zygotes: an approach to overcome an impaired uterine environment.Reprod Biomed Online. 2012 Dec;25(6):591-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.09.004. Epub 2012 Sep 16. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012. PMID: 23069744
-
Large-volume vitrification of human biopsied and non-biopsied blastocysts: a simple, robust technique for cryopreservation.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015 Feb;32(2):207-14. doi: 10.1007/s10815-014-0395-9. Epub 2014 Dec 3. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015. PMID: 25464896 Free PMC article.
-
Closed versus open vitrification for human blastocyst cryopreservation: A meta-analysis.Cryobiology. 2017 Aug;77:64-70. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 May 15. Cryobiology. 2017. PMID: 28522355
-
A critical appraisal of cryopreservation (slow cooling versus vitrification) of human oocytes and embryos.Hum Reprod Update. 2012 Sep-Oct;18(5):536-54. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dms016. Epub 2012 Apr 25. Hum Reprod Update. 2012. PMID: 22537859 Review.
Cited by
-
Human oocytes and zygotes are ready for ultra-fast vitrification after 2 minutes of exposure to standard CPA solutions.Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 5;9(1):15986. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52014-x. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 31690725 Free PMC article.
-
Day 7 blastocyst euploidy supports routine implementation for cycles using preimplantation genetic testing.JBRA Assist Reprod. 2019 Jan 31;23(1):45-50. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20180089. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2019. PMID: 30614486 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Assessment of Survival and Clinical Outcome Between Two Commercial Vitrification Kits with Different Warming Protocols After Blastocyst Culture: Potential Perspectives Toward Simplified Warming Procedures.Reprod Sci. 2023 Nov;30(11):3212-3221. doi: 10.1007/s43032-023-01281-1. Epub 2023 Jun 13. Reprod Sci. 2023. PMID: 37311945 Free PMC article.
-
Cryopreservation and IVF in the time of Covid-19: what is the best good tissue practice (GTP)?J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 Oct;37(10):2393-2398. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01904-5. Epub 2020 Aug 3. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020. PMID: 32748306 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Edgar DH, Gook DA. A critical appraisal of cryopreservation (slow cooling versus vitrification) of human oocytes and embryos. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2012;16:536–554. - PubMed
-
- Schiewe MC, Whitney JB, Anderson RE. Potential risk of monochorionic dizygotic twin blastocyst formation associated with early laser zona dissection of group cultured embryos. Fertil. Steril. 2015;103:417–421. - PubMed
-
- Schiewe MC. The historic development and incorporation of four assisted reproductive technologies shaping today's IVF industry. J. Fertil. In Vitro Reprod. Med. Genet. 2016;4:2–9.
-
- Rall WF, Fahy GM. Ice-free cryopreservation of mouse embryos at -196 degrees C by vitrification. Nature. 1985;313:573–575. - PubMed
-
- Rall WF, Wood MJ, Kirby C, Whittingham DG. Development of mouse embryos cryopreserved by vitrification. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1987;80:499–504. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources