Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2017 Aug:40:7-10.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Mar 1.

Time required to initiate outbreak and pandemic observational research

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Time required to initiate outbreak and pandemic observational research

Asgar H Rishu et al. J Crit Care. 2017 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: Observational research focused upon emerging infectious diseases such as Ebola virus, Middle East respiratory syndrome, and Zika virus has been challenging to quickly initiate. We aimed to determine the duration of start-up procedures and barriers encountered for an observational study focused upon such infectious outbreaks.

Materials and methods: At 1 pediatric and 5 adult intensive care units, we measured durations from protocol receipt to a variety of outbreak research milestones, including research ethics board (REB) approval, data sharing agreement (DSA) execution, and patient study screening initiation.

Results: The median (interquartile range) time from site receipt of the protocol to REB submission was 73 (30-126) days; to REB approval, 158 (42-188) days; to DSA completion, 276 (186-312) days; and to study screening initiation, 293 (269-391) days. The median time from REB submission to REB approval was 43 (13-85) days. The median time for all start-up procedures was 335 (188-335) days.

Conclusions: There is a lengthy start-up period required for outbreak-focused research. Completing DSAs was the most time-consuming step. A reactive approach to newly emerging threats such as Ebola virus, Middle East respiratory syndrome, and Zika virus will likely not allow sufficient time to initiate research before most outbreaks are advanced.

Keywords: Canada; Critical; Intensive care; Outbreak; Pandemic; Research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Diagrammatic representation of median time (in days) spent from receipt of protocol, REB submission, and finalization of data sharing agreements to task completion at study sites.

Comment in

References

    1. Kilbourne E.D. Influenza pandemics of the 20th century. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12(1):9–14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fowler R.A., Abdelmalik P., Wood G., Foster D., Gibney N., Bandrauk N. Critical care capacity in Canada: results of a national cross-sectional study. Crit Care. 2015;19:133. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Christian M.D., Hawryluck L., Wax R.S., Cook T., Lazar N.M., Herridge M.S. Development of a triage protocol for critical care during an influenza pandemic. CMAJ. 2006;175(11):1377–1381. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eastman N., Philips B., Rhodes A. Triaging for adult critical care in the event of overwhelming need. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36(6):1076–1082. - PubMed
    1. Fowler R.A., Lapinsky S.E., Hallett D., Detsky A.S., Sibbald W.J., Slutsky A.S. Critically ill patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. JAMA. 2003;290(3):367–373. - PubMed

Publication types