Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep;26(9):704-713.
doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005867. Epub 2017 Mar 13.

Use of standard risk screening and assessment forms to prevent harm to older people in Australian hospitals: a mixed methods study

Affiliations

Use of standard risk screening and assessment forms to prevent harm to older people in Australian hospitals: a mixed methods study

Bernice Redley et al. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Standard risk screening and assessment forms are frequently used in strategies to prevent harm to older people in hospitals. Little is known about good practices for their use.

Objective: Scope the preventable harms addressed by standard forms used to screen and assess older people and how standard forms are operationalised in hospitals across Victoria, Australia.

Methods: Mixed methods study: (1) cross-sectional audit of the standard risk screening and assessment forms used to assess older people at 11 health services in 2015; (2) nine focus groups with a purposive sample of 69 participants at 9 health services. Descriptive analysis examined the number of items on forms, preventable harms assessed and sources of duplication. Qualitative thematic analysis of focus group data identified themes explaining issues commonly affecting how health services used the forms.

Results: 152 standard assessment forms from 11 Victorian health services included over 3700 items with 17% duplicated across multiple forms. Assessments of skin integrity and mobility loss (including falls) were consistently included in forms; however, nutrition, cognitive state, pain and medication risks were inconsistent; and continence, venous thromboembolism risk and hospital acquired infection from invasive devices were infrequent. Qualitative analyses revealed five themes explaining issues associated with current use of assessment forms: (1) comprehensive assessment of preventable harms; (2) burden on staff and the older person, (3) interprofessional collaboration, (4) flexibility to individualise care and (5) information management. Examples of good practice were identified.

Conclusions: Current use of standard risk screening and assessment forms is associated with a high burden and gaps in assessment of several common preventable harms that can increase risk to older people in hospital. Improvement should focus on streamlining forms, increased guidance on interventions to prevent harm and facilitating front-line staff to manage complex decisions.

Keywords: Health services research; Healthcare quality improvement; Patient safety; Risk management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Comment in

  • From polyformacy to formacology.
    Allen D. Allen D. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Sep;26(9):695-697. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006677. Epub 2017 Mar 31. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017. PMID: 28364058 No abstract available.

LinkOut - more resources