Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2017 Apr;26(2):105-114.
doi: 10.1017/S2045796016000767.

From the EBM pyramid to the Greek temple: a new conceptual approach to Guidelines as implementation tools in mental health

L Salvador-Carulla  1 , S Lukersmith  1 , W Sullivan  2
Affiliations
Editorial

From the EBM pyramid to the Greek temple: a new conceptual approach to Guidelines as implementation tools in mental health

L Salvador-Carulla et al. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Guideline methods to develop recommendations dedicate most effort around organising discovery and corroboration knowledge following the evidence-based medicine (EBM) framework. Guidelines typically use a single dimension of information, and generally discard contextual evidence and formal expert knowledge and consumer's experiences in the process. In recognition of the limitations of guidelines in complex cases, complex interventions and systems research, there has been significant effort to develop new tools, guides, resources and structures to use alongside EBM methods of guideline development. In addition to these advances, a new framework based on the philosophy of science is required. Guidelines should be defined as implementation decision support tools for improving the decision-making process in real-world practice and not only as a procedure to optimise the knowledge base of scientific discovery and corroboration. A shift from the model of the EBM pyramid of corroboration of evidence to the use of broader multi-domain perspective graphically depicted as 'Greek temple' could be considered. This model takes into account the different stages of scientific knowledge (discovery, corroboration and implementation), the sources of knowledge relevant to guideline development (experimental, observational, contextual, expert-based and experiential); their underlying inference mechanisms (deduction, induction, abduction, means-end inferences) and a more precise definition of evidence and related terms. The applicability of this broader approach is presented for the development of the Canadian Consensus Guidelines for the Primary Care of People with Developmental Disabilities.

Keywords: Evidence-based psychiatry; clinical guidelines; complexity; framing of scientific knowledge; implementation; intellectual developmental disorders; quality assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Moving from the pyramid model of scientific knowledge to the General framework: Greek temple model of scientific knowledge.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Alper BS, Haynes RB (2016). EBHC Pyramid 5.0 for accessing preappraised evidence and guidance. Evidence based Medicine 21, 123–125. - PubMed
    1. Bertelli MO, Munir K, Harris J, Salvador-Carulla L (2016a). Intellectual developmental disorders: reflections on the international consensus document for redefining. mental retardation-intellectual disability in ICD-11. Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disability 10(1), 36–58. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bertelli MO, Munir K, Salvador-Carulla L (2016b). Fair is foul, and foul is fair: reframing neurodevelopmental disorders in the neurodevelopmental perspective. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. August 1 [Epub ahead of print]. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bingeman E (2016). Evaluating normative epistemic frameworks in medicine: EBM and casuistic medicine. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 22(4), 490–495. - PubMed
    1. Boyd EA and Bero LA (2006). Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 4. Managing conflicts of interests. Health Research Policy and Systems 4, 16. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types