Measuring Patient Mobility in the ICU Using a Novel Noninvasive Sensor
- PMID: 28291092
- PMCID: PMC5697716
- DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002265
Measuring Patient Mobility in the ICU Using a Novel Noninvasive Sensor
Abstract
Objectives: To develop and validate a noninvasive mobility sensor to automatically and continuously detect and measure patient mobility in the ICU.
Design: Prospective, observational study.
Setting: Surgical ICU at an academic hospital.
Patients: Three hundred sixty-two hours of sensor color and depth image data were recorded and curated into 109 segments, each containing 1,000 images, from eight patients.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: Three Microsoft Kinect sensors (Microsoft, Beijing, China) were deployed in one ICU room to collect continuous patient mobility data. We developed software that automatically analyzes the sensor data to measure mobility and assign the highest level within a time period. To characterize the highest mobility level, a validated 11-point mobility scale was collapsed into four categories: nothing in bed, in-bed activity, out-of-bed activity, and walking. Of the 109 sensor segments, the noninvasive mobility sensor was developed using 26 of these from three ICU patients and validated on 83 remaining segments from five different patients. Three physicians annotated each segment for the highest mobility level. The weighted Kappa (κ) statistic for agreement between automated noninvasive mobility sensor output versus manual physician annotation was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.72-1.00). Disagreement primarily occurred in the "nothing in bed" versus "in-bed activity" categories because "the sensor assessed movement continuously," which was significantly more sensitive to motion than physician annotations using a discrete manual scale.
Conclusions: Noninvasive mobility sensor is a novel and feasible method for automating evaluation of ICU patient mobility.
Conflict of interest statement
The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Comparison of Automated Activity Recognition to Provider Observations of Patient Mobility in the ICU.Crit Care Med. 2019 Sep;47(9):1232-1234. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003852. Crit Care Med. 2019. PMID: 31162207
-
Process Monitoring in the Intensive Care Unit: Assessing Patient Mobility Through Activity Analysis with a Non-Invasive Mobility Sensor.Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2016 Oct;9900:482-490. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-46720-7_56. Epub 2016 Oct 2. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2016. PMID: 29170766 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy and feasibility of point-of-care and continuous blood glucose analysis in critically ill ICU patients.Crit Care. 2006;10(5):R135. doi: 10.1186/cc5048. Crit Care. 2006. PMID: 16981981 Free PMC article.
-
Quantifying Mobility in the ICU: Comparison of Electronic Health Record Documentation and Accelerometer-Based Sensors to Clinician-Annotated Video.Crit Care Explor. 2020 Apr 29;2(4):e0091. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000091. eCollection 2020 Apr. Crit Care Explor. 2020. PMID: 32426733 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of Zero-Heat-Flux Cutaneous Temperature in Intensive Care Adults.Crit Care Med. 2017 Jul;45(7):e715-e717. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002317. Crit Care Med. 2017. PMID: 28410347
Cited by
-
Deep learning to quantify care manipulation activities in neonatal intensive care units.NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Jun 27;7(1):172. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01164-y. NPJ Digit Med. 2024. PMID: 38937643 Free PMC article.
-
Standardisation, multi-measure, data quality and trending: A qualitative study on multidisciplinary perspectives to improve intensive care early mobility monitoring.Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2021 Apr;63:102949. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2020.102949. Epub 2020 Nov 14. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2021. PMID: 33199104 Free PMC article.
-
Recent advances in the technology of anesthesia.F1000Res. 2020 May 18;9:F1000 Faculty Rev-375. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.24059.1. eCollection 2020. F1000Res. 2020. PMID: 32494358 Free PMC article. Review.
-
CAI4CAI: The Rise of Contextual Artificial Intelligence in Computer Assisted Interventions.Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng. 2020 Jan;108(1):198-214. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2019.2946993. Epub 2019 Oct 23. Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng. 2020. PMID: 31920208 Free PMC article.
-
Actigraphy to Evaluate Sleep in the Intensive Care Unit. A Systematic Review.Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018 Sep;15(9):1075-1082. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201801-004OC. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018. PMID: 29944386 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Lord RK, Mayhew CR, Korupolu R, et al. ICU early physical rehabilitation programs: Financial modeling of cost savings. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:717–724. - PubMed
-
- Kayambu G, Boots R, Paratz J. Physical therapy for the critically ill in the ICU: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:1543–1554. - PubMed
-
- Hashem MD, Nelliot A, Needham DM. Early mobilization and rehabilitation in the intensive care unit: Moving back to the future. Respir Care. 2016;61:971–979. - PubMed
-
- Morris PE, Goad A, Thompson C, et al. Early intensive care unit mobility therapy in the treatment of acute respiratory failure. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:2238–2243. - PubMed