The authors reply
- PMID: 28291111
- PMCID: PMC5358803
- DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002271
The authors reply
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest. T.W.R. reported serving on an advisory board for Avisa Pharma, LLC, as a DSMB member for GlaxoSmithKline PLC, and as Director of Medical Affairs for Cumberland Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Comment on
-
Randomized Trial of Video Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults.Crit Care Med. 2016 Nov;44(11):1980-1987. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001841. Crit Care Med. 2016. PMID: 27355526 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Randomized Trial of Video Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults: More Data, More Questions.Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr;45(4):e460-e461. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002218. Crit Care Med. 2017. PMID: 28291110 No abstract available.
References
-
- Mendelson JS, Kelner KJ, BS Kaufman. Randomized Trial of Video Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults: More Data, More Questions. Crit Care Med. 2017 in press. - PubMed
-
- Silverberg MJ, Li N, Acquah SO, et al. Comparison of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy during urgent endotracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med. 2015;43:636–641. - PubMed
-
- Hurford D, Cook T, Nolan J, et al. Control group bias: a potential cause of over-estimating the benefit of videolaryngoscopy on laryngeal view. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111:124–125. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources