Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1988 Jan;85(1):83-7.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.1.83.

Reversible receptor methylation is essential for normal chemotaxis of Escherichia coli in gradients of aspartic acid

Affiliations

Reversible receptor methylation is essential for normal chemotaxis of Escherichia coli in gradients of aspartic acid

R M Weis et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Jan.

Abstract

The chemotaxis of wild-type cells of Escherichia coli and double mutants lacking the methyltransferase and the methylesterase activities of the receptor modification system has been compared in spatial gradients of aspartic acid. Previous studies showing that a chemotactic response can be observed for the mutant raised questions about the role of methylation in the bacterial memory. To clarify the role of methylation, the redistribution of bacteria in stabilized defined gradients of aspartic acid was monitored by light scattering. There was no redistribution of the mutant cells in nonsaturating gradients of aspartic acid, but over the same range these mutant bacteria were observed to respond and to adapt during tethering experiments. In large saturating gradients of aspartate, slight movement of the mutant up the gradient was observed. These results show that dynamic receptor methylation is required for the chemotactic response to gentle gradients of aspartic acid and that methylation resets to zero and is part of the normal wild-type memory. There are certain gradients, however, in which the methylation-deficient mutants show chemotactic ability, thus explaining the apparent anomaly.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Nat New Biol. 1972 Mar 29;236(65):120-3 - PubMed
    1. J Biol Chem. 1956 Jan;218(1):97-106 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1972 Oct 27;239(5374):500-4 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1972 Oct 27;239(5374):517-8 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1974 May 3;249(452):73-4 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources