Defining the diagnostic divide: an analysis of registered radiological equipment resources in a low-income African country
- PMID: 28292062
- PMCID: PMC5325496
- DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2016.25.99.9736
Defining the diagnostic divide: an analysis of registered radiological equipment resources in a low-income African country
Abstract
Introduction: Diagnostic radiology is recognised as a key component of modern healthcare. However there is marked inequality in global access to imaging. Rural populations of low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have the greatest need. Carefully coordinated healthcare planning is required to meet the ever increasing global demand for imaging and to ensure equitable access to services. However, meaningful planning requires robust data. Currently, there are no comprehensive published data on radiological equipment resources in low-income countries. The aim of this study was to conduct the first detailed analysis of registered diagnostic radiology equipment resources in a low-income African country and compare findings with recently published South African data.
Methods: The study was conducted in Tanzania in September 2014, in collaboration with the Tanzanian Atomic Energy Commission (TAEC), which maintains a comprehensive database of the country's registered diagnostic imaging equipment. All TAEC equipment data were quantified as units per million people by imaging modality, geographical zone and healthcare sector.
Results: There are 5.7 general radiography units per million people in the public sector with a relatively homogeneous geographical distribution. When compared with the South African public sector, Tanzanian resources are 3-, 21- and 6-times lower in general radiography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, respectively.
Conclusion: The homogeneous Tanzanian distribution of basic public-sector radiological services reflects central government's commitment to equitable distribution of essential resources. However, the 5.7 general radiography units per million people is lower than the 20 units per million people recommended by the World Health Organization.
Keywords: Tanzania; diagnostic radiology; imaging equipment resources; low-income country.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
References
-
- Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Larson EB. rising use of diagnostic medical imaging in a large integrated health system: the use of imaging has skyrocketed in the past decade, but no one patient population or medical condition is responsible. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Nov-Dec;27(6):1491–1502. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Lee CI, Enzmann DR. Measuring radiology's value in time saved. J Am Coll Radiol. 2012 Oct;9(10):713–7. - PubMed
-
- Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Lee C, Feigelson HS, Flynn M, Greenlee RT, Kruger RL, Hornbrook MC, Roblin D, Solberg LI, Vanneman N, Weinmann S, Williams AE. Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems, 1996-2010. JAMA. 2012 Jun 13;307(22):2400–9. - PMC - PubMed
-
- You JJ. ICES report: Appropriateness: the next frontier in the quest for better access to CT and MRI. Healthc Q. 2009;12(4):25–7. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical