Risks and Benefits of Postoperative Double-J Stent Placement After Ureteroscopy: Results from the Clinical Research Office of Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study
- PMID: 28292209
- DOI: 10.1089/end.2016.0827
Risks and Benefits of Postoperative Double-J Stent Placement After Ureteroscopy: Results from the Clinical Research Office of Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study
Abstract
Purpose: Double-J stent placement after stone removal by ureteroscopy (URS) is common and recommended in many cases but debatable in others. In this study, the risks and benefits of postoperative Double-J stent placement in URS stone treatment procedures undertaken in current clinical practice are examined.
Materials and methods: The Clinical Research Office of Endourological Society (CROES) URS is a prospective, observational, international multicenter study, in which patients are candidates for URS as primary treatment or after failure of prior treatment for ureteral and renal stones. Baseline, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected. Predictors and outcomes of postoperative stent placement were analyzed by inverse probability-weighted regression adjustment of the relationship between a Double-J stent placement and outcomes (complications, readmission [including retreatment], and length of hospital stay).
Results: Significant predictors of postoperative Double-J stent placement in URS treatment of ureteral stones were intraoperative complications, impacted stones, operation time, stone burden, age, presence of a solitary kidney, and stone-free rate. In renal stone treatment, the predictors identified included operation time, age, preoperative stent placement, anticoagulant use, presence of a solitary kidney, and intraoperative complications. In both ureteral and renal stone treatment groups, postoperative placement of a Double-J stent resulted in significantly fewer postoperative complications (p < 0.001) compared with patients who did not receive a stent.
Conclusions: Patient- and procedure-related variables were identified, which may enable an individualized approach to postoperative stenting, resulting in improved clinical outcomes in urologic stone treatment by URS.
Keywords: renal calculi; stent; ureteral calculi; ureteroscopy; urolithiasis.
Similar articles
-
Ureteral stent versus no ureteral stent for ureteroscopy in the management of renal and ureteral calculi.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Feb 6;2(2):CD012703. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012703.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 30726554 Free PMC article.
-
Preoperative JJ stent placement in ureteric and renal stone treatment: results from the Clinical Research Office of Endourological Society (CROES) ureteroscopy (URS) Global Study.BJU Int. 2016 Apr;117(4):648-54. doi: 10.1111/bju.13250. Epub 2015 Sep 6. BJU Int. 2016. PMID: 26237735
-
The Influence of Body Mass Index on Outcomes in Ureteroscopy: Results from the Clinical Research Office of Endourological Society URS Global Study.J Endourol. 2017 Jan;31(1):20-26. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0514. Epub 2016 Nov 29. J Endourol. 2017. PMID: 27798969
-
Impact of case volume on outcomes of ureteroscopy for ureteral stones: the clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study.Eur Urol. 2014 Dec;66(6):1046-51. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.054. Epub 2014 Jul 12. Eur Urol. 2014. PMID: 25027366
-
Outcomes of ureteroscopy and internal ureteral stent for pregnancy with urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Urol. 2022 Sep 14;22(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01100-w. BMC Urol. 2022. PMID: 36104697 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Ureteral stent versus no ureteral stent for ureteroscopy in the management of renal and ureteral calculi.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Feb 6;2(2):CD012703. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012703.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 30726554 Free PMC article.
-
Ureteral stenting practices following routine ureteroscopy: an international survey.World J Urol. 2019 Nov;37(11):2501-2508. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02660-7. Epub 2019 Feb 11. World J Urol. 2019. PMID: 30747279
-
Clinical and postoperative characteristics of stentless ureteroscopy patients: a prospective analysis from ReSKU.Can J Urol. 2023 Jun;30(3):11532-11537. Can J Urol. 2023. PMID: 37344463 Free PMC article.
-
[Interrater reliability and clinical impact of the Post-Ureteroscopic Lesion Scale (PULS) grading system for ureteral lesions after ureteroscopy : Results of the German prospective multicenter BUSTER project].Urologe A. 2018 Feb;57(2):172-180. doi: 10.1007/s00120-017-0565-3. Urologe A. 2018. PMID: 29322235 German.
-
Assessing flexible ureteroscopy outcomes for lower Pole versus non lower Pole stones using the flexible and navigable suction ureteric access sheath: a prospective multicenter study by EAU Endourology and PEARLS group.World J Urol. 2024 Dec 20;43(1):41. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05384-5. World J Urol. 2024. PMID: 39704866
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources