Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar 14;18(1):110.
doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1459-7.

Prospective clinical evaluation of a novel anatomic cuff for forearm crutches in patients with osteoarthritis

Thomas Hügle  1   2 , Ansgar Arnieri  3 , Margerita Bünter  4 , Stefan Schären  4 , Annegret Mündermann  3   5
Affiliations

Prospective clinical evaluation of a novel anatomic cuff for forearm crutches in patients with osteoarthritis

Thomas Hügle et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: The use of forearm crutches has been associated with pain and neuropraxia along the ulnar bone. Whilst anatomic grips have improved comfort of crutch walking, to date anatomic forearm cuffs have not been clinically evaluated. The aim of this clinical pilot study was to determine if the use of forearm crutches with anatomic cuffs reduces pain and increases comfort and function in long-term users of forearm crutches during a 4-week period.

Method: Prospective study in ten patients suffering from end-stage osteoarthritis of the lower extremity. All participants were long-term users of conventional forearm crutches. Participants used forearm crutches with an anatomically shaped cuff for 4-weeks. General health was assessed using the SF-36, and the crutches were evaluated using a newly developed questionnaire focusing on symptoms along the forearm.

Results: Pain and paresthesia along the forearms decreased by 3.3 points (95% confidence interval difference (CI): [-5.0; -1.6], p = .004) and 3.5 points (95%CI: [-5.1; -1.9], p = .002), respectively, after using the crutches with the new anatomic cuff for 4 weeks. Comfort and sense of security of crutch use increased by 3.0 points (95%CI: [1.3; 4.7], p = .007) and 2.4 points (95%CI: [0.7; 4.1], p = .024). Cross-correlation analysis revealed correlations among items in the same item category and no correlations between items of different item categories of the new questionnaires.

Conclusion: An anatomically shaped cuff increases comfort of forearm crutches. Further research should confirm long-term clinical improvement.

Trial registration: This study was registered retrospectively in ISRCTN (TRN: ISRCTN 11135150 ) on 14/02/2017.

Keywords: Comfort; Crutch design; Crutches; Pain; Walking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Photograph of the cuff with the lateral recess and a conventional cuff
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
UlnarPro Questionnaire. A specific questionnaire focusing on symptoms along the forearm with a unipolar 9-point Likert-scale. Questions were classified into four different item categories: pain and dysaesthesia along the forearm; comfort and sense of security; symptoms of the hands; symptoms of the shoulders
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Individual change in scores of the UlnarPro questionnaires from baseline to 4-week follow-up for items 1 to 17
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Individual change in scores of the different dimensions of the SF36 questionnaire from baseline to 4-week follow-up
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Kaye HS, JKang T, LaPlante MP. Mobility device use in the United States. In: Research NIoDaR, editor. Disability Statistics Report 2000
    1. Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M, Shibuya K, Salomon JA, Abdalla S, Aboyans V, et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. 2013;380:2163–96. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61729-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown CJ, Flood KL. Mobility limitation in the older patient: a clinical review. JAMA. 2013;310:1168–77. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.276566. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jones A, Silva PG, Silva AC, Colucci M, Tuffanin A, Jardim JR, Natour J. Evaluation of immediate impact of cane use on energy expenditure during gait in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Gait Posture. 2012;35:435–9. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.11.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fisher SV, Patterson RP. Energy cost of ambulation with crutches. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1981;62:250–6. - PubMed

Associated data