Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Mar 14;7(3):e013612.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013612.

Adult and adolescent livestock productive asset transfer programmes to improve mental health, economic stability and family and community relationships in rural South Kivu Province, Democratic Republic of Congo: a protocol of a randomised controlled trial

Anjalee Kohli  1 , Nancy A Perrin  2 , Mitima Mpanano Remy  3 , Mirindi Bacikenge Alfred  4 , Kajabika Binkurhorhwa Arsene  4 , Mwinja Bufole Nadine  4 , Banyewesize Jean Heri  4 , Mitima Murhula Clovis  4 , Nancy Glass  1
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Adult and adolescent livestock productive asset transfer programmes to improve mental health, economic stability and family and community relationships in rural South Kivu Province, Democratic Republic of Congo: a protocol of a randomised controlled trial

Anjalee Kohli et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: People living in poverty have limited access to traditional financial institutions. Microfinance programmes are designed to meet this gap and show promise in improving income, economic productivity and health. Our Congolese-US community academic research partnership developed two livestock productive asset transfer programmes, Pigs for Peace (PFP) and Rabbits for Resilience (RFR), to address the interlinked health, social and economic well-being of individuals, their families and communities. The community-based randomised controlled trials examine the effectiveness of PFP and RFR to improve health, economic stability, and family and community relationships among male and female adults and adolescents living in 10 rural, postconflict villages of eastern Democratic Republic of Congo.

Methods and analysis: PFP participants include adult permanent residents of rural villages; adolescent participants in RFR include male and female adolescents 10-15 years old living in the selected rural villages. Participants were randomised to intervention or delayed control group. Participants in PFP completed baseline interview prior to intervention and follow-up interview at 6, 12 and 18 months postintervention. In RFR, participants completed baseline interview prior to intervention and follow-up interview at 6, 12 and 18 months postbaseline. The primary outcome of both trials, the change in baseline mental health distress at 18 months in the intervention group (adults, adolescents) compared to control group, is used to calculate sample size.

Ethics and dissemination: The Johns Hopkins Medical Institute Internal Review Board approved this protocol. A committee of respected Congolese educators and community members (due to lack of local ethics review board) approved the study. The findings will provide important information on the potential for community-led sustainable development initiatives to build on traditional livelihood (livestock raising, agriculture) to have a sustained health, economic and social impact on the individual, family and community.

Trial registration number: NCT02008708, NCT02008695.

Keywords: Conflict; Democratic Republic of Congo; MENTAL HEALTH; Microfinance; impact evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PFP and RFR intervention and delayed control groups in all 10 participating villages of Walungu and Kabare Territories. PFP, Pigs for Peace; RFR, Rabbits for Resilience.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Timing of follow-up interviews linked to pig and rabbit growth and reproduction. PFP, Pigs for Peace; RFR, Rabbits for Resilience.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. World Bank. Agriculture and Rural Development Indicators, 2014. http://data.worldbank.org/topic/agriculture-and-rural-development
    1. Helmore K, Chidiac S, Hendricks L. Microfinance in Africa: State-of-the-sector report: Bringing fInancial services to Africa's poor: CARE, 2009. http://care.ca/sites/default/files/files/publications/accessafricasosrep....
    1. Overseas Development Institute. The definition of extreme poverty has just changed—here's what you need to know 2015. https://www.odi.org/comment/9934-extreme-poverty-definition-world-bank-s... (accessed 24 Apr 2016).
    1. von Bastelaer T. Does social capital facilitate the poor's access to credit? A review of the microeconomic literature. Social Capital Initiative Working Paper World Bank, 2000.
    1. Patel RB. Microfinance: untapped potential for global health. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2014;25:1718–22. 10.1353/hpu.2014.0169 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data