The Effect of Four Different Gonadotropin Protocols on Oocyte and Embryo Quality and Pregnancy Outcomes in IVF/ICSI Cycles; A Randomized Controlled Trial
- PMID: 28293051
- PMCID: PMC5337766
The Effect of Four Different Gonadotropin Protocols on Oocyte and Embryo Quality and Pregnancy Outcomes in IVF/ICSI Cycles; A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Background: Despite the large number of papers published on the efficiency of different exogenous gonadotropins, no confirmed protocol exists. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of 4 exogenous gonadotropins in IVF/ICSI cycles.
Methods: This study, performed from January 2014 to May 2014, recruited 160 women referred to Ghadir Mother and Child Hospital and Dena Hospital, Shiraz, Iran. The patients underwent standard downregulation and were randomly divided into 4 groups of A, B, C, and D and were administered hMG, hFSH, rFSH, and combined sequential hFSH/rFSH, respectively. Then, the duration of stimulation, number of oocytes and embryos as well as their quality, implantation rate, biochemical and clinical pregnancy rate, and live birth rate in each group were evaluated.
Results: Group D patients required significantly fewer ampoules of FSH than did the women in groups A, B, and C (P=0.004). The duration of stimulation was significantly longer in group C than in groups A and D (P=0.030). The serum estradiol level was significantly higher in group D than in groups B and C (P=0.005). A significantly higher number of large-sized follicles was observed in group D than in group B (P=0.036).
Conclusion: Our data revealed no statistically significant differences in the mean oocyte number, embryo quality, clinical pregnancy rate, or live birth rate between the hMG, hFSH, rFSH, and sequential hFSH/rFSH protocols. However, several differences in the duration of stimulation, serum estradiol levels, and number of large-sized follicles were detected between the groups. Trial Registration Number: IRCT201408116541N7.
Keywords: Gonadotropins; Oocytes; Pregnancy.
Figures
References
-
- Kamel RM. Assisted reproductive technology after the birth of louise brown. J Reprod Infertil. 2013;14:96–109. [ PMC Free Article] - PMC - PubMed
-
- Alaee S, Novin MG, Noroozian M, Yeganeh F, Pakravesh J, Heidari M, et al. Evaluation of progesterone receptor, FKBP51 and FKBP52, associated with uterine receptivity, in endometrial tissue of women with repeated implantation failure. Acta Endocrinologica (Buc) 2014;10:329–39. doi: 10.4183/aeb.2014.329. - DOI
-
- Lai Q, Zhang H, Zhu G, Li Y, Jin L, He L, et al. Comparison of the GnRH agonist and antagonist protocol on the same patients in assisted reproduction during controlled ovarian stimulation cycles. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2013;6:1903–10. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.02.053. [ PMC Free Article] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Turhan N, Pekel A, Ayrim A, Kasap B, Bayrak Ö. Effectiveness of HP-hMG versus r-FSH in patients undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles with moderate male-factor infertility. Turk J Med Sci. 2013;43:144–9.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources