This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Comment

. 2017 Feb 28:8:277.

doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00277. eCollection 2017.

Commentary: Pupil old/new effects reflect stimulus encoding and decoding in short-term memory

Alex Kafkas¹, Daniela Montaldi¹

Affiliations

PMID: 28293207
PMCID: PMC5329021
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00277

Comment

Commentary: Pupil old/new effects reflect stimulus encoding and decoding in short-term memory

Alex Kafkas et al. Front Psychol. 2017.

. 2017 Feb 28:8:277.

doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00277. eCollection 2017.

Authors

Alex Kafkas¹, Daniela Montaldi¹

Affiliation

¹ Memory Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester Manchester, UK.

PMID: 28293207
PMCID: PMC5329021
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00277

No abstract available

Keywords: familiarity; old/new effect; pupil response; recognition memory; recollection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Response: Commentary: Pupil old/new effects reflect stimulus encoding and decoding in short-term memory.
Brocher A, Graf T. Brocher A, et al. Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 7;8:539. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00539. eCollection 2017. Front Psychol. 2017. PMID: 28439252 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Comment on

Pupil old/new effects reflect stimulus encoding and decoding in short-term memory.
Brocher A, Graf T. Brocher A, et al. Psychophysiology. 2016 Dec;53(12):1823-1835. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12770. Epub 2016 Oct 5. Psychophysiology. 2016. PMID: 27706828

Similar articles

Response: Commentary: Pupil old/new effects reflect stimulus encoding and decoding in short-term memory.
Brocher A, Graf T. Brocher A, et al. Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 7;8:539. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00539. eCollection 2017. Front Psychol. 2017. PMID: 28439252 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Pupil old/new effects reflect stimulus encoding and decoding in short-term memory.
Brocher A, Graf T. Brocher A, et al. Psychophysiology. 2016 Dec;53(12):1823-1835. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12770. Epub 2016 Oct 5. Psychophysiology. 2016. PMID: 27706828
Pupil dilation during recognition reflects the subjective recollection/familiarity experience at test rather than the level of processing at encoding.
Taikh A, Bodner GE. Taikh A, et al. Can J Exp Psychol. 2022 Sep;76(3):186-192. doi: 10.1037/cep0000283. Epub 2022 May 12. Can J Exp Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35549359
Recollection and familiarity in schizophrenia: a quantitative review.
Libby LA, Yonelinas AP, Ranganath C, Ragland JD. Libby LA, et al. Biol Psychiatry. 2013 May 15;73(10):944-50. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.10.027. Epub 2012 Dec 14. Biol Psychiatry. 2013. PMID: 23245761 Free PMC article. Review.
The role of the human hippocampus in familiarity-based and recollection-based recognition memory.
Wixted JT, Squire LR. Wixted JT, et al. Behav Brain Res. 2010 Dec 31;215(2):197-208. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.04.020. Epub 2010 Apr 20. Behav Brain Res. 2010. PMID: 20412819 Free PMC article. Review.

See all similar articles

Cited by

Individual pupil size changes as a robust indicator of cognitive familiarity differences.
Franzen L, Cabugao A, Grohmann B, Elalouf K, Johnson AP. Franzen L, et al. PLoS One. 2022 Jan 21;17(1):e0262753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262753. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35061832 Free PMC article.
Response: Commentary: Pupil old/new effects reflect stimulus encoding and decoding in short-term memory.
Brocher A, Graf T. Brocher A, et al. Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 7;8:539. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00539. eCollection 2017. Front Psychol. 2017. PMID: 28439252 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Is Pupil Activity Associated With the Strength of Memory Signal for Words in a Continuous Recognition Memory Paradigm?
Oliveira J, Fernandes M, Rosa PJ, Gamito P. Oliveira J, et al. Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 23;12:686183. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686183. eCollection 2021. Front Psychol. 2021. PMID: 34887795 Free PMC article.

References

1. Beatty J., Lucero-Wagoner B. (2000). The pupillary system, in Handbook of Psychophysiology, eds Cacioppo J. T., Tassinary L. G., Berntson G. G. (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; ), 142–162.
1. Brocher A., Graf T. (2016). Pupil old/new effects reflect stimulus encoding and decoding in short-term memory. Psychophysiology 53, 1823–1835. 10.1111/psyp.12770 - DOI - PubMed
1. Buzsáki G., Anastassiou C. A., Koch C. (2012). The origin of extracellular fields and currents EEG, ECoG, LFP and spikes. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 407–420. 10.1038/nrn3241 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
1. Gardiner J. M., Java R. I. (1990). Recollective experience in word and nonword recognition. Mem. Cognit. 18, 23–30. - PubMed
1. Kafkas A., Montaldi D. (2011). Recognition memory strength is predicted by pupillary responses at encoding while fixation patterns distinguish recollection from familiarity. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 64, 1971–1989. 10.1080/17470218.2011.588335 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Actions

Grants and funding

094597/WT_/Wellcome Trust/United Kingdom

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
- scite Smart Citations