Commentary: Pupil old/new effects reflect stimulus encoding and decoding in short-term memory

Affiliations

Comment

Alex Kafkas et al. Front Psychol. 2017.

. 2017 Feb 28:8:277.

doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00277. eCollection 2017.

¹ Memory Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester Manchester, UK.

No abstract available

Keywords: familiarity; old/new effect; pupil response; recognition memory; recollection.

Comment in

Response: Commentary: Pupil old/new effects reflect stimulus encoding and decoding in short-term memory.
Brocher A, Graf T. Brocher A, et al. Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 7;8:539. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00539. eCollection 2017. Front Psychol. 2017. PMID: 28439252 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Pupil old/new effects reflect stimulus encoding and decoding in short-term memory.
Brocher A, Graf T. Brocher A, et al. Psychophysiology. 2016 Dec;53(12):1823-1835. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12770. Epub 2016 Oct 5. Psychophysiology. 2016. PMID: 27706828

1. Beatty J., Lucero-Wagoner B. (2000). The pupillary system, in Handbook of Psychophysiology, eds Cacioppo J. T., Tassinary L. G., Berntson G. G. (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; ), 142–162.
1. Brocher A., Graf T. (2016). Pupil old/new effects reflect stimulus encoding and decoding in short-term memory. Psychophysiology 53, 1823–1835. 10.1111/psyp.12770 - DOI - PubMed
1. Buzsáki G., Anastassiou C. A., Koch C. (2012). The origin of extracellular fields and currents EEG, ECoG, LFP and spikes. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 407–420. 10.1038/nrn3241 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
1. Gardiner J. M., Java R. I. (1990). Recollective experience in word and nonword recognition. Mem. Cognit. 18, 23–30. - PubMed
1. Kafkas A., Montaldi D. (2011). Recognition memory strength is predicted by pupillary responses at encoding while fixation patterns distinguish recollection from familiarity. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 64, 1971–1989. 10.1080/17470218.2011.588335 - DOI - PubMed