Factors determining uptake of diabetic retinopathy screening in Oxfordshire
- PMID: 28295529
- PMCID: PMC5485053
- DOI: 10.1111/dme.13350
Factors determining uptake of diabetic retinopathy screening in Oxfordshire
Abstract
Aims: To investigate variables at the demographic and primary care practice levels that influence the uptake of diabetic retinopathy screening.
Methods: Data were extracted from the management software of one screening programme for 21 797 people registered with 79 general practices. Uptake was examined by gender, age group, modality of screening (mobile unit at general practice versus high-street optometrist), and by general practice. A telephone survey of high-street optometrists provided information on the availability of screening appointments.
Results: Uptake was 82.4% during the study period, and was higher for men (83.2%) than for women (81.5%) (P = 0.001). Uptake varied by age group (P < 0.001), being lowest in those aged 12-39 years (67%). Uptake was higher for people invited to a general practice for screening by a mobile unit (83.5%) than for those invited for screening by a high-street optometrist (82%) (P = 0.006). After adjusting for these factors and for socio-economic deprivation score at the location of the general practice, heterogeneity in uptake rate was still observed between some practices. Our survey of optometrists indicated wide variation in the availability of time slots for screening during the week and of screening appointment provision.
Conclusions: Diabetic retinopathy screening services do not achieve high uptake among the youngest or oldest age groups. Practices in the least deprived areas had the highest uptake. Variation in uptake between general practices after adjustment for individual-level variables and deprivation suggests that practice-level factors may have an important role in determining rates of screening attendance.
© 2017 The Authors. Diabetic Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Diabetes UK.
Figures
References
-
- Diabetes UK: facts and stats PDF (website). Available at https://www.diabetes.org.uk/Professionals/Position-statements-reports/St... Last accessed 26 January 2017.
-
- Gulliford MC, Dodhia H, Chamley M, McCormick K, Mohamed M, Naithani S et al Socio‐economic and ethnic inequalities in diabetes retinal screening. Diabet Med 2010; 27: 282–288. - PubMed
-
- UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group . Intensive blood glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998; 352: 837–853. - PubMed
-
- The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) Research Group . The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long‐term complications in insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 977–986. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
