Factors determining uptake of diabetic retinopathy screening in Oxfordshire
- PMID: 28295529
- PMCID: PMC5485053
- DOI: 10.1111/dme.13350
Factors determining uptake of diabetic retinopathy screening in Oxfordshire
Abstract
Aims: To investigate variables at the demographic and primary care practice levels that influence the uptake of diabetic retinopathy screening.
Methods: Data were extracted from the management software of one screening programme for 21 797 people registered with 79 general practices. Uptake was examined by gender, age group, modality of screening (mobile unit at general practice versus high-street optometrist), and by general practice. A telephone survey of high-street optometrists provided information on the availability of screening appointments.
Results: Uptake was 82.4% during the study period, and was higher for men (83.2%) than for women (81.5%) (P = 0.001). Uptake varied by age group (P < 0.001), being lowest in those aged 12-39 years (67%). Uptake was higher for people invited to a general practice for screening by a mobile unit (83.5%) than for those invited for screening by a high-street optometrist (82%) (P = 0.006). After adjusting for these factors and for socio-economic deprivation score at the location of the general practice, heterogeneity in uptake rate was still observed between some practices. Our survey of optometrists indicated wide variation in the availability of time slots for screening during the week and of screening appointment provision.
Conclusions: Diabetic retinopathy screening services do not achieve high uptake among the youngest or oldest age groups. Practices in the least deprived areas had the highest uptake. Variation in uptake between general practices after adjustment for individual-level variables and deprivation suggests that practice-level factors may have an important role in determining rates of screening attendance.
© 2017 The Authors. Diabetic Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Diabetes UK.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Diabetic retinopathy: effects of national guidelines on the referral, examination and treatment practices of ophthalmologists and optometrists.Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2001 Apr;29(2):52-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-9071.2001.d01-3.x. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2001. PMID: 11341446
-
Management of diabetic retinopathy by Australian optometrists. Working Group on Evaluation of NHMRC Retinopathy Guideline Distribution. National Health and Medical Research Council.Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1999 Dec;27(6):404-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1606.1999.00263.x. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1999. PMID: 10641898
-
Influence of primary care practices on patients' uptake of diabetic retinopathy screening: a qualitative case study.Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Aug;64(625):e484-92. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X680965. Br J Gen Pract. 2014. PMID: 25071061 Free PMC article.
-
Diabetic retinopathy management by Australian optometrists.Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011 Apr;39(3):230-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2010.02446.x. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011. PMID: 20973897
-
Equity of uptake of a diabetic retinopathy screening programme in a geographically and socio-economically diverse population.Public Health. 2013 Sep;127(9):814-21. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2013.04.015. Epub 2013 Aug 22. Public Health. 2013. PMID: 23973045
Cited by
-
Diabetic retinopathy screening and treatment through the Brazilian National Health Insurance.Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 17;12(1):13941. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18054-6. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35977971 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring Factors Associated with Diabetic Retinopathy Treatment Compliance Behaviour in Cape Town, South Africa.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 20;18(22):12209. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212209. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34831965 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of multi-level barriers and facilitators in a large diabetic retinopathy screening program in federally qualified health centers: a qualitative study.Implement Sci Commun. 2021 May 22;2(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00157-2. Implement Sci Commun. 2021. PMID: 34022946 Free PMC article.
-
Sex Disparities in Cardiovascular Risk Factor Assessment and Screening for Diabetes-Related Complications in Individuals With Diabetes: A Systematic Review.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Mar 30;12:617902. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.617902. eCollection 2021. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021. PMID: 33859615 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of ethnicity and other sociodemographic factors on attendance at ophthalmology appointments following referral from a Diabetic Eye Screening Programme: a retrospective cohort study.BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2025 Jan 22;10(1):e001969. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001969. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2025. PMID: 39843349 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Diabetes UK: facts and stats PDF (website). Available at https://www.diabetes.org.uk/Professionals/Position-statements-reports/St... Last accessed 26 January 2017.
-
- Gulliford MC, Dodhia H, Chamley M, McCormick K, Mohamed M, Naithani S et al Socio‐economic and ethnic inequalities in diabetes retinal screening. Diabet Med 2010; 27: 282–288. - PubMed
-
- UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group . Intensive blood glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998; 352: 837–853. - PubMed
-
- The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) Research Group . The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long‐term complications in insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 977–986. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical