Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2017 Mar;96(11):e6354.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006354.

Evaluation of intrathecal drug delivery system for intractable pain in advanced malignancies: A prospective cohort study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Evaluation of intrathecal drug delivery system for intractable pain in advanced malignancies: A prospective cohort study

Shuyue Zheng et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Pain is prevalent in advanced malignancies; however, some patients cannot get adequate pain relief by conservative routes of analgesic administration or experience serious side effects related to high dose of opioids. For those who have exhausted multimodal conservative analgesic, intrathecal drug delivery is an alternative intervention for truly effective pain management. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of intrathecal drug delivery system (IDDS) for the treatment of intractable pain in advanced cancer patients.A prospective cohort study was performed between July 2015 and October 2016. Fifty-three patients undergoing intractable cancer-related pain or intolerable drug-related adverse effects were recruited and received IDDS therapy with a patient-controlled intrathecal analgesia pump. The assessment was conducted during admission, in titration period, and followed up monthly to death by scheduled refill visits. Pain numeric rating scale scores, comprehensive toxicity scores, quality of life scores, systemic opioid use (basal and breakthrough dose), intrathecal morphine use (basal and patient-controlled intrathecal analgesia dose), and complications were recorded to evaluate the curative effect and safety.Between baseline and all subsequent follow-ups, statistically significant decreases in pain numeric rating scale scores and comprehensive toxicity scores were verified. A statistical improvement in quality of life scores was found after starting IDDS therapy. Both basal and breakthrough doses of systemic opioid showed a significant decrease during the follow-up period. And there was a modest escalation in the intrathecal morphine dose throughout the duration of study. No infective, device-related, and catheter-related complications were observed.The findings showed that IDDS therapy allowed for rapid and highly effective pain relief with less toxicity in comparison to conservative medications. Patients with advanced malignancies would also benefit from an improvement in the life quality after the procedure. IDDS therapy represented a valuable option for intractable cancer-related pain management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The flowchart of patient recruitment. CSF = cerebrospinal fluid.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A boxplot of pain NRS scores and toxicity scores at baseline and different follow-up visits after procedure. () A significant difference compared with baseline value (P < 0.05). NRS = numeric rating scale; T death = 1 week before death; T dis = the time of discharge, T0 = baseline, T1 = 1 month after procedure, T3 = 3 months after procedure.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The proportion of patients with significant pain relief (≥50%) and intrathecal morphine dose over the follow-up period. Error bars represent 95% CI for the mean. CI = confidence interval, IT = intrathecal; T death = 1 week before death; T dis = the time of discharge, T0 = baseline, T1 = 1 month after procedure, T3 = 3 months after procedure.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Bar chart of QOL scores at baseline and all subsequent observations in follow-up period. () A significant difference compared with baseline value. QOL = quality of life; T death = 1 week before death; T dis = the time of discharge, T0 = baseline, T1 = 1 month after procedure, T3 = 3 months after procedure.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. van den Beuken-van Everdingen MH, de Rijke JM, Kessels AG, et al. Prevalence of pain in patients with cancer: a systematic review of the past 40 years. Ann Oncol 2007;18:1437–49. - PubMed
    1. Jadad AR, Browman GP. The WHO analgesic ladder for cancer pain management. Stepping up the quality of its evaluation. JAMA 1995;274:1870–3. - PubMed
    1. Walker VA, Hoskin PJ, Hanks GW, et al. Evaluation of WHO analgesic guidelines for cancer pain in a hospital-based palliative care unit. J Pain Symptom Manage 1988;3:145–9. - PubMed
    1. Zech DF, Grond S, Lynch J, et al. Validation of World Health Organization guidelines for cancer pain relief: a 10-year prospective study. Pain 1995;63:65–76. - PubMed
    1. Chen L, Sein M, Vo T, et al. Clinical interpretation of opioid tolerance versus opioid-induced hyperalgesia. J Opioid Manag 2014;10:383–93. - PubMed

Publication types