The Effect of Graft Pretensioning on Bone Tunnel Diameter and Bone Formation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in a Rat Model: Evaluation With Micro-Computed Tomography
- PMID: 28298055
- DOI: 10.1177/0363546516686967
The Effect of Graft Pretensioning on Bone Tunnel Diameter and Bone Formation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in a Rat Model: Evaluation With Micro-Computed Tomography
Abstract
Background: Moderate graft pretensioning in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is paramount to restore knee stability and normalize knee kinematics. However, little is known about the effect of graft pretensioning on graft-to-bone healing after ACL reconstruction.
Hypothesis: Moderate graft pretensioning will improve bone formation within the bone tunnel after ACL reconstruction, resulting in superior load to failure.
Study design: Controlled laboratory study.
Methods: 67 male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent unilateral ACL reconstruction with a flexor digitorum longus tendon autograft. The graft was subjected to pretensioning forces of 0 N, 5 N, or 10 N. Custom-made external fixators were used for knee immobilization postoperatively. Rats were euthanized for biomechanical load-to-failure testing (n = 45) and micro-computed tomography (μCT) examination (n = 22) at 3 and 6 weeks after surgery. Three regions of each femoral and tibial bone tunnel (aperture, middle, and tunnel exit) were chosen for measurement of tunnel diameter and new bone formation.
Results: Biomechanical tests revealed significantly higher load-to-failure in the 5-N graft pretensioned group compared with the 0- and 10-N groups at 3 weeks (8.58 ± 2.67 N vs 3.96 ± 1.83 N and 4.46 ± 2.62 N, respectively) and 6 weeks (16.56 ± 3.50 N vs 10.82 ± 1.97 N and 7.35 ± 2.85 N, respectively) after surgery ( P < .05). The mean bone tunnel diameters at each of the 3 regions were significantly smaller in the 5-N group, at both the femoral and tibial tunnel sites, than in the 0- and 10-N groups ( P < .05). At 3 and 6 weeks postoperatively, the bone mineral density, bone volume fraction, and connectivity density around the aperture and middle regions of the tibial bone tunnels were all significantly higher in the 5-N group compared with the 0- and 10-N groups ( P < .05). In the aperture and middle regions of the femoral bone tunnels, pretensioning at either 5 or 10 N resulted in increased bone formation compared with the nonpretensioned group at 3 weeks postoperatively. No differences were found in bone formation between any of the 3 femoral tunnel regions at 6 weeks.
Conclusion: Graft pretensioning can stimulate new bone formation and improve tendon-to-bone tunnel healing after ACL reconstruction.
Clinical relevance: Optimal graft pretensioning force in ACL reconstruction can improve bone tunnel healing. Further study is necessary to understand the mechanisms underlying the effect of graft pretensioning on healing at the bone-tunnel interface.
Keywords: ACL reconstruction; bone formation; bone tunnel; graft pretensioning; micro–computed tomography.
Similar articles
-
Effect of Dynamic Changes in Anterior Cruciate Ligament In Situ Graft Force on the Biological Healing Response of the Graft-Tunnel Interface.Am J Sports Med. 2018 Mar;46(4):915-923. doi: 10.1177/0363546517745624. Epub 2018 Jan 3. Am J Sports Med. 2018. PMID: 29298079
-
An Autograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Results in Better Biomechanical Performance and Tendon-Bone Incorporation Than Does a Hybrid Graft in a Rat Model.Am J Sports Med. 2020 Dec;48(14):3515-3524. doi: 10.1177/0363546520967668. Epub 2020 Nov 3. Am J Sports Med. 2020. PMID: 33141598
-
The Effects of Tensioning of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft on Healing after Soft Tissue Reconstruction.J Knee Surg. 2021 Apr;34(5):561-569. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1700842. Epub 2019 Nov 4. J Knee Surg. 2021. PMID: 31683352
-
Graft impingement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Mar;21(3):664-70. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2014-6. Epub 2012 Apr 25. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013. PMID: 22527419 Review.
-
Two-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Bone Graft Options for Tunnel Augmentation.Am J Sports Med. 2020 Mar;48(3):767-777. doi: 10.1177/0363546519841583. Epub 2019 May 22. Am J Sports Med. 2020. PMID: 31116949
Cited by
-
MFG-E8 promotes tendon-bone healing by regualting macrophage efferocytosis and M2 polarization after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.J Orthop Translat. 2022 May 11;34:11-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2022.04.002. eCollection 2022 May. J Orthop Translat. 2022. PMID: 35615640 Free PMC article.
-
Cartilage fragments combined with BMSCs-Derived exosomes can promote tendon-bone healing after ACL reconstruction.Mater Today Bio. 2023 Sep 26;23:100819. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100819. eCollection 2023 Dec. Mater Today Bio. 2023. PMID: 37810754 Free PMC article.
-
Remnants-preserving ACL reconstruction using direct tendinous graft fixation: a new rat model.J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Jan 5;17(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02890-9. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022. PMID: 34986843 Free PMC article.
-
Relationship between altered knee kinematics and subchondral bone remodeling in a clinically translational model of ACL injury.J Orthop Res. 2022 Jan;40(1):74-86. doi: 10.1002/jor.24943. Epub 2020 Dec 23. J Orthop Res. 2022. PMID: 33295680 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Demineralized Bone Matrix, Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stromal Cells, and Platelet-Rich Plasma on Bone Tunnel Healing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparative Micro-Computed Tomography Study in a Tendon Allograft Sheep Model.Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Sep 21;9(9):23259671211034166. doi: 10.1177/23259671211034166. eCollection 2021 Sep. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021. PMID: 34568508 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical