Attenuation of Hemodynamic Response to Skull Pin Head Holder Insertion: Intravenous Clonidine versus Intravenous Lignocaine Infusion
- PMID: 28298771
- PMCID: PMC5341652
- DOI: 10.4103/0259-1162.186592
Attenuation of Hemodynamic Response to Skull Pin Head Holder Insertion: Intravenous Clonidine versus Intravenous Lignocaine Infusion
Abstract
Background: Insertion of skull pin induces a significant increase in heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP) and intracranial pressure. Alpha 2 agonist clonidine and intravenous (i.v.) lignocaine are effective in attenuating stress response. Local infiltration of pin site and scalp block with lignocaine are commonly used techniques for prevention of hemodynamic response to skull pin insertion. We compared the effectiveness of i.v. clonidine infusion and i.v. lignocaine infusion in suppressing the hemodynamic response to skull pin head holder insertion.
Designs: Randomized double blind study conducted with sample size - sixty patients, divided into two groups: Group C (n = 30) - clonidine i.v. dose 2 μg/kg; Group L (n = 30) - lignocaine i.v. dose 1.5 mg/kg.
Materials and methods: All patients posted for elective craniotomy belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 1 and 2, age group 18-70 were included in the study. ASA 3, 4; difficult airway; hypertensives; allergy to study drugs; ischemic heart disease; and arteriovenous malformations were excluded. Study drugs were administered 10 min prior to induction in 10 ml syringes with infusion pump over 10 min. Standard anesthesia protocol followed. HR, noninvasive BP, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and IBP were recorded at baseline (BL), after study drug (AD), 1 min after intubation (AI), 1 min prior to pin insertion -pre pin (PP), and 5 min after pin insertion (AP).
Analysis: Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis - Student's t- and Chi-square/Fisher exact test were used (SAS 9.2, SPSS 15.0) P value described as *moderately significant (P value: 0.01 < P ≤ 0.05) **strongly significant (P value: P ≤ 0.01).
Results: Groups were matched with respect to age (P = 0.7), gender distribution (P = 0.6), and weight (P = 0.67) There was no difference in BL HR in two groups. Significant difference in HR was noted after intubation P < 0.031 and pin insertion P < 0.001 stages with lower HR in Group C (76.03 ± 9.88) versus Group L (98 ± 60.89) MAP recordings showed no statistically significant difference in two groups at BL and after drug administration stages. A significant difference was seen in intubation (P < 0.014), very significant difference (P < 0.001) was noted in pre- and post-pin insertion stages with MAP was lower in Group C (76.03 ± 9.88) versus Group L (87.17 ± 8.90).
Conclusion: i.v. clonidine at dose of 2 μg/kg is a better drug in attenuating hemodynamic response to skull pin head holder insertion than i.v. lignocaine.
Keywords: Clonidine; hemodynamic response; lignocaine; skull pin head holder.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Low Dose Dexmedetomidine Attenuates Hemodynamic Response to Skull Pin Holder Application.Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Jan-Mar;11(1):57-61. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.200229. Anesth Essays Res. 2017. PMID: 28298757 Free PMC article.
-
A Comparative Study of Clonidine and Lignocaine for Attenuating Pressor Responses to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Neurosurgical Cases.Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Apr-Jun;11(2):401-405. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.194557. Anesth Essays Res. 2017. PMID: 28663630 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison between intravenous dexmedetomidine and local lignocaine infiltration to attenuate the haemodynamic response to skull pin head holder application during craniotomy.Indian J Anaesth. 2015 Dec;59(12):785-8. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.171558. Indian J Anaesth. 2015. PMID: 26903671 Free PMC article.
-
The effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine on hemodynamic response in patients undergoing skull-pin head-holder application during neurosurgery - A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Aug;195:105939. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105939. Epub 2020 May 20. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020. PMID: 32480196
-
The effectiveness of scalp nerve block on hemodynamic response in craniotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.Minerva Anestesiol. 2023 Jan-Feb;89(1-2):85-95. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.22.16775-1. Epub 2022 Nov 30. Minerva Anestesiol. 2023. PMID: 36448987
Cited by
-
Analgesia nociception index and hemodynamic changes during skull pin application for supratentorial craniotomies in patients receiving scalp block versus pin-site infiltration: A randomized controlled trial.Saudi J Anaesth. 2019 Oct-Dec;13(4):306-311. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_812_18. Saudi J Anaesth. 2019. PMID: 31572074 Free PMC article.
-
Intravenous dexmedetomidine versus levobupivacaine for hemodynamic response towards skull pin insertion.Bioinformation. 2025 Mar 31;21(3):434-440. doi: 10.6026/973206300210434. eCollection 2025. Bioinformation. 2025. PMID: 40599956 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of add-on Gabapentin premedication on hemodynamic response to skull pin insertion.J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Apr-Jun;38(2):288-293. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_368_20. Epub 2022 Feb 14. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2022. PMID: 36171931 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of effects of dexmedetomidine added to ropivacaine versus ropivacaine alone infiltration scalp block for attenuation of the haemodynamic response to skull pin placement in neurosurgical procedures: A double-blind, randomised clinical trial.Indian J Anaesth. 2021 Nov;65(11):782-788. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_450_21. Epub 2021 Nov 23. Indian J Anaesth. 2021. PMID: 35001949 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bithal PK, Dash HH, Chauhan R, Mohanty B. Haemodynamic changes in response to skull-pins application – Comparison between normotensive and hypertensive patients. Indian J Anaesth. 2002;46:383–5.
-
- Johnson JO, Grecu L, Lawson NW. Autonomic nervous system. In: Barash PG, Cullen BF, Stoelting RK, Cahalan MK, Stock M, editors. Clinical Anesthesia. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Publishing; 2009. p. 328. 331-6, 354-5.
-
- Costello TG, Cormack JR. Clonidine premedication decreases hemodynamic responses to pin head-holder application during craniotomy. Anesth Analg. 1998;86:1001–4. - PubMed
-
- Makwama DS, Thakkar JM, Majmudar R, Shnodhi A, Malviya G, Patel MB. Clonidine premedication decreases hemodynamic responses to pin head-holder-application during craniotomy. Asian Pac J Health Sci. 2015;2:57–61.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous