Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan-Apr;10(1):13-16.
doi: 10.4103/0974-620X.200684.

Mobile unit for retinopathy of prematurity screening and management at urban Neonatal Intensive Care Units: Outcomes and impact assessment

Affiliations

Mobile unit for retinopathy of prematurity screening and management at urban Neonatal Intensive Care Units: Outcomes and impact assessment

Jai Kelkar et al. Oman J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jan-Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: To study the outcomes and impact of a mobile unit for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening and management at urban Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs).

Study design: Public health intervention study.

Methods: This study was conducted in 2012. Staff of a mobile unit assessed all infants aged 32 weeks or less and/or weight 1250 g or less admitted in five NICUs between 2009 and 2011. An ophthalmologist performed bedside ROP screening through dilated pupils using indirect ophthalmoscopy. ROP was graded and managed as per the International Classification of ROP treatment guidelines. Counseling and laser treatment were the interventions. The incidence, grade, and determinants of ROP were estimated. Direct and indirect costs were calculated to estimate the unit cost of screening and managing a child with ROP using the mobile unit.

Result: The study sample included 104 preterm/underweight infants. The prevalence of ROP of different grades in either eye was 32.7% (95% confidence intervals: 23.7-41.7). ROP Stage I was present in 75% of these eyes. The mobile unit could help in preventing/reducing visual disability in 5 infants with advanced stages of ROP. The unit cost of ROP screening, identifying one child with ROP, and addressing visual disability due to ROP was US $310, 950, and 6500, respectively.

Conclusion: A mobile screening is likely feasible and cost-effective method to detect ROP and offer timely intervention in urban areas with limited resources.

Keywords: Childhood blindness; health economics; retinopathy of prematurity; screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Azad R. Prevention of blindness due to retinopathy of prematurity: A national movement. Indian J Pediatr. 2014;81:1373–5. - PubMed
    1. Niranjan HS, Benakappa N, Reddy KB, Nanda S, Kamath MV. Retinopathy of prematurity promising newer modalities of treatment. Indian Pediatr. 2012;49:139–43. - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Action Plan 2006-2013. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2007. [Last accessed on 2014 Jun 05]. Childhood Blindness in VISION 2020 the Right to the Sight. Global Initiative for Elimination of Avoidable Blindness; pp. 22–5. Available from: http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://www.who.int/blindness/V... .
    1. Black MM, Pérez-Escamilla R, Rao SF. Integrating nutrition and child development interventions: Scientific basis, evidence of impact, and implementation considerations. Adv Nutr. 2015;6:852–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fierson WM, Saunders RA, Good W, Palmer EA, Phelps D, Reynolds J, et al. Screening examination of premature infants for retinopathy of prematurity. Pediatrics. 2013;131:189–95. - PubMed