Flexural strength and microhardness of anterior composites after accelerated aging
- PMID: 28298986
- PMCID: PMC5347293
- DOI: 10.4317/jced.53463
Flexural strength and microhardness of anterior composites after accelerated aging
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the flexural strength and microhardness of three different anterior composites after 10 000 thermocycles.
Material and methods: The mechanical properties of a nano-fill composite (Filtek Ultimate Universal Restorative (FUR) (Enamel)), a nano-hybrid composite (Clearfil Majesty ES2 (ES2) (Enamel)), and a micro-hybrid composite (G Aenial Anterior (GAA)) were investigated in this study. For the microhardness test, 8-mm diameter and 2-mm thickness composite discs were used (n = 10), and for the flexural strength test, 25x2x2 mm bar-shaped specimens were prepared (n = 13). The specimens were tested at 24 h and after 10 000 thermocycles. Data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and the post-hoc Tukey test (p < .05). Correlations between hardness and flexural strength were calculated using Pearson's correlation analysis.
Results: There was a significant difference in the microhardness values of the materials (p < .05). FUR exhibited significantly higher microhardness than ES2 and GAA. However, the flexural strength of three composites was statistically similar at 24 h (p > .05). Pearson correlation analysis revealed that there was a negative relationship between the mean hardness and flexural strength values (correlation coefficient = -0.367, p = .043). After 10 000 thermocycles, microhardness values of each material and flexural strength of ES2 and GAA decreased significantly according to 24 h.
Conclusions: The nano-fill composite FUR displayed significantly higher microhardness values. However, each resin composite was statistically similar for flexural strength values. Ten thousand thermocycles significantly affected microhardness and flexural strength. Key words:Flexural strength, microhardness, anterior composites.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest statement:The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exist.
Figures
References
-
- Ferracane JL. Resin composite-state of the art. Dent Mater. 2011;27:29–38. - PubMed
-
- Correa MB, Peres MA, Peres KG, Horta BL, Barros AD, Demarco FF. Amalgam or composite resin? Factors influencing the choice of restorative material. J Dent. 2012;40:703–10. - PubMed
-
- Heintze SD, Rousson V, Hickel R. Clinical effectiveness of direct anterior restorations--a meta-analysis. Dent Mater. 2015;31:481–95. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous