The effect of short polyethylene fiber with different weight percentages on diametral tensile strength of conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cements
- PMID: 28298993
- PMCID: PMC5347300
- DOI: 10.4317/jced.53550
The effect of short polyethylene fiber with different weight percentages on diametral tensile strength of conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cements
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of polyethylene fiber on diametral tensile strength of conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cements.
Material and methods: 60 specimens in 6 groups (n=10) were prepared. In group 1 conventional glass ionomer (Fuji GC) and in group 2 resin modified glass ionomer (Fuji LC) were as control groups. In group 3 and 4 conventional glass ionomers mixed with short polyethylene fibers in proportion of 1 wt% and 3 wt%, respectively. In fifth and sixth groups, resin modified glass ionomer and short polyethylene fibers were mixed in 1 and 3% wt, respectively. Samples were prepared in a round brass mold (6.5×2.5 mm). After thermo-cycling, the diametral tensile strength of the specimens were tested and data were analyzed with ANOVA and post-hoc tests (p<0.05).
Results: Diametral tensile strength of both conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cements increased after mixing with polyethylene fiber (p<0.001). Also, reinforcement occurred as the mixing percentage increased from 1% wt to 3% wt in either conventional and resin modified glass ionomer (p<0.001).
Conclusions: The polyethylene fiber was shown to have a significant positive influence on diametral tensile strength of two types of glass ionomers. Key words:Conventional glass ionomer, diametral tensile strength, polyethylene fiber, resin modified glass ionomer.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest statement:The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Diametral tensile strength and water sorption of glass-ionomer cements used in Atraumatic Restorative Treatment.J Appl Oral Sci. 2003 Jun;11(2):96-101. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572003000200003. J Appl Oral Sci. 2003. PMID: 21409320
-
Effect of the incorporation of hydroxyapatite on the diametral tensile strength of conventional and hybrid glass ionomer cements.Odontology. 2021 Oct;109(4):904-911. doi: 10.1007/s10266-021-00624-1. Epub 2021 Jun 10. Odontology. 2021. PMID: 34114136
-
Hollow glass fibers in reinforcing glass ionomer cements.Dent Mater. 2017 Feb;33(2):e86-e93. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Nov 9. Dent Mater. 2017. PMID: 27836115
-
A Review of Glass-Ionomer Cements for Clinical Dentistry.J Funct Biomater. 2016 Jun 28;7(3):16. doi: 10.3390/jfb7030016. J Funct Biomater. 2016. PMID: 27367737 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Glass Ionomer Cements for the Restoration of Non-Carious Cervical Lesions in the Geriatric Patient.J Funct Biomater. 2018 Jul 8;9(3):42. doi: 10.3390/jfb9030042. J Funct Biomater. 2018. PMID: 29986535 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of the Effect of Nanoparticle Graphene Oxide on Flexural Strength of Glass Ionomer Cements.Int J Dent. 2023 Jan 30;2023:8183167. doi: 10.1155/2023/8183167. eCollection 2023. Int J Dent. 2023. PMID: 36756382 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison the Effect of Bromelain Enzyme, Phosphoric Acid, and Polyacrylic Acid Treatment on Microleakage of Composite and Glass Ionomer Restorations.J Dent (Shiraz). 2022 Jun;23(1 Suppl):175-182. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2021.88737.1355. J Dent (Shiraz). 2022. PMID: 36380843 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Three Types of Glass Ionomer Cements Containing Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles to Deep and Superficial Dentin.J Dent (Shiraz). 2020 Jun;21(2):132-140. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2019.77762.0. J Dent (Shiraz). 2020. PMID: 32582829 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Hydroxyapatite on Surface Roughness of Zirconomer, and Conventional and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomers.Front Dent. 2020 Dec 20;17:36. doi: 10.18502/fid.v17i36.5201. eCollection 2020. Front Dent. 2020. PMID: 36042796 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison between the effect of adding microhydroxyapatite and chitosan on surface roughness and Microhardness of resin modified and conventional glass ionomer cements.J Clin Exp Dent. 2021 Aug 1;13(8):e737-e744. doi: 10.4317/jced.55996. eCollection 2021 Aug. J Clin Exp Dent. 2021. PMID: 34512911 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Paschoal MA, Gurgel CV, Rios D, Magalhães AC, Buzalaf MA, Machado MA. Fluoride release profile of a nanofilled resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Braz Dent J. 2011;22:275–9. - PubMed
-
- Hammouda IM. Reinforcement of conventional glass-ionomer restorative material with short glass fibers. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2009;2:73–81. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous