Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Mar;7(1):28-38.
doi: 10.1007/s13142-015-0380-6.

Improving physical activity program adoption using integrated research-practice partnerships: an effectiveness-implementation trial

Samantha M Harden  1   2   3 , Sallie Beth Johnson  1   3 , Fabio A Almeida  1   3   4 , Paul A Estabrooks  5   6   7
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Improving physical activity program adoption using integrated research-practice partnerships: an effectiveness-implementation trial

Samantha M Harden et al. Transl Behav Med. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Integrated research-practice partnerships (IRPPs) may improve adoption of evidence-based programs. The aim of this study is to compare adoption of an IRPP-developed physical activity (PA) program (Fit Extension, FitEx) to a typical efficacy-effectiveness-dissemination pipeline model program (Active Living Every Day, ALED). Guided by the Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework, a randomized controlled trial assigned health educators (HEs) to FitEx (n = 18) or ALED (n = 18). Fourteen HEs adopted FitEx, while two HEs adopted ALED (χ 2 = 21.8; p < 0.05). FitEx HEs took less time to deliver (p < 0.05), stated greater intentions for continued program delivery (p < 0.05), and reached more participants (n = 1097 total; 83 % female; 70 % Caucasian; M age = 44 ± 11.8) per HE than ALED (n = 27 total; 60 % female; 50 % Caucasian; M age = 41 ± 11.3). No significant difference existed in FitEx or ALED participants' increased PA (M increase = 9.12 ±29.09 min/day; p > 0.05). IRPP-developed programs may improve PA program adoption, implementation, and maintenance and may also result in programs that have higher reach-without reducing effectiveness.

Keywords: Physical activity; RE-AIM; Research-practice; Translation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no competing interests.

Adherence to ethical principles

This study followed accepted principles of ethical and professional conduct. The study received expedited review by the Virginia Tech Institutional Review Board (no. 08-466).

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Research to practice models
Fig 2
Fig 2
Recruitment and retention of health educators. The primary outcome of adoption through the recruitment and retention process is displayed
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Healthy People 2020. Washington, DC. http://www.healthypeople.gov/. Accessed 1 Jul 2015.
    1. Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup JF, et al. Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. JAMA. 2004 - PubMed
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The power of prevention. Steps to a HealthierUS: a program and policy perspective. 2003: 1–9.
    1. Estabrooks PA, Glasgow RE, Dzewaltowski DA. Physical activity promotion though primary care. JAMA. 2003;289:2913–2916. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.22.2913. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Prevalence of regular physical activity among adults—United States, 2001 and 2005. 2007;56(46). - PubMed

Publication types