Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 May;32(4):963-970.
doi: 10.1177/0890117117696244. Epub 2017 Mar 16.

Effects of a Flexibility/Support Intervention on Work Performance: Evidence From the Work, Family, and Health Network

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of a Flexibility/Support Intervention on Work Performance: Evidence From the Work, Family, and Health Network

Jeremy W Bray et al. Am J Health Promot. 2018 May.

Abstract

Purpose: To estimate the effects of a workplace initiative to reduce work-family conflict on employee performance.

Design: A group-randomized multisite controlled experimental study with longitudinal follow-up.

Setting: An information technology firm.

Participants: Employees randomized to the intervention (n = 348) and control condition (n = 345).

Intervention: An intervention, "Start. Transform. Achieve. Results." to enhance employees' control over their work time, to increase supervisors' support for this change, and to increase employees' and supervisors' focus on results.

Methods: We estimated the effect of the intervention on 9 self-reported employee performance measures using a difference-in-differences approach with generalized linear mixed models. Performance measures included actual and expected hours worked, absenteeism, and presenteeism.

Results: This study found little evidence that an intervention targeting work-family conflict affected employee performance. The only significant effect of the intervention was an approximately 1-hour reduction in expected work hours. After Bonferroni correction, the intervention effect is marginally insignificant at 6 months and marginally significant at 12 and 18 months.

Conclusion: The intervention reduced expected working time by 1 hour per week; effects on most other employee self-reported performance measures were statistically insignificant. When coupled with the other positive wellness and firm outcomes, this intervention may be useful for improving employee perceptions of increased access to personal time or personal wellness without sacrificing performance. The null effects on performance provide countervailing evidence to recent negative press on work-family and flex work initiatives.

Keywords: field experiment; performance; productivity; supervisor support; well-being; workplace flexibility; workplace intervention; work–family conflict.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Goetzel RZ, Henke RM, Tabrizi M, Pelletier KR, Loeppke R, Ballard DW, et al. Do workplace health promotion (wellness) programs work? J Occup Environ Med. 2014;56(9):927–934. - PubMed
    1. Horwitz JR, Kelly BD, DiNardo JE. Wellness incentives in the workplace: cost savings through cost shifting to unhealthy workers. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(3):468–476. - PubMed
    1. Goetzel R The value of workplace health promotion (wellness) programs. Health Affairs Blog; 2014. Available at: http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2013/10/30/workplace-wellness-programs-con.... Accessed November 5, 2015.
    1. Goetzel R Workplace wellness programs: continuing the discussion. Health Affairs Blog; 2014. Available at: http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2014/01/27/workplace-wellness-programs-con.... Accessed November 5, 2015.
    1. Goetzel RZ. Do prevention or treatment services save money? The wrong debate. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28(1):37–41. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources