Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2017 Oct-Dec;39(4):355-364.
doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2016-1959. Epub 2017 Mar 13.

Kraepelin's views on obsessive neurosis: a comparison with DSM-5 criteria for obsessive-compulsive disorder

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Kraepelin's views on obsessive neurosis: a comparison with DSM-5 criteria for obsessive-compulsive disorder

Holger Steinberg et al. Braz J Psychiatry. 2017 Oct-Dec.

Abstract

Emil Kraepelin (1856-1926) is considered one of the founders of modern psychiatric nosology. However, his conceptualization of obsessive-compulsive phenomena is relatively understudied. In this article, we compare and contrast excerpts from the eighth edition (1909-1915) of Kraepelin's Textbook of Clinical Psychiatry focusing on what Kraepelin called "obsessive neurosis" and related "original pathological conditions" with the current DSM-5 criteria for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Consistently with DSM-5 OCD, Kraepelin described obsessive neurosis as characterized by obsessive ideas, compulsive acts, or both together. His detailed descriptions of these symptoms are broadly coherent with their characterization in DSM-5, which is also true for the differential diagnoses he provided. He also mentioned cases illustrating decreased insight into symptoms and association with tic disorders. In conclusion, Kraepelin's experience, which reflects decades of consistent clinical work, may help validate current ideas and explain how the current conceptualization has emerged and developed. Even though one can hardly say that the classification laid out in DSM-5 goes back to Kraepelin's views directly, it still is true that Kraepelin played an outstanding role in systematizing psychiatric diagnostic criteria in general, and provided a major contribution to the conceptual history of OCD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Comment in

  • When the past is present.
    Torres AR, Costa DLC, Miguel EC. Torres AR, et al. Braz J Psychiatry. 2017 Oct-Dec;39(4):284-285. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2017-2422. Braz J Psychiatry. 2017. PMID: 28977071 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Angst J. Historical aspects of the dichotomy between manic-depressive disorders and schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2002;57:5–13. - PubMed
    1. Berrios GE, Hauser R. The early development of Kraepelin’s ideas on classification: a conceptual history. Psychol Med. 1988;18:813–21. - PubMed
    1. Blashfield R. The classification of psychopathology: neo-kraepelinian and quantitative approaches. New York: Plenum; 1984.
    1. Decker HS. The psychiatric works of Emil Kraepelin: a many-faceted story of modern medicine. J Hist Neurosci. 2004;13:248–76. - PubMed
    1. Hoff P. Emil Kraepelin und die Psychiatrie als klinische Wissenschaft: Ein Beitrag zum Selbstverständnis psychiatrischer Forschung. Berlin: Springer; 1994.

Publication types

MeSH terms