Species-free species distribution models describe macroecological properties of protected area networks
- PMID: 28301488
- PMCID: PMC5354291
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173443
Species-free species distribution models describe macroecological properties of protected area networks
Abstract
Among the greatest challenges facing the conservation of plants and animal species in protected areas are threats from a rapidly changing climate. An altered climate creates both challenges and opportunities for improving the management of protected areas in networks. Increasingly, quantitative tools like species distribution modeling are used to assess the performance of protected areas and predict potential responses to changing climates for groups of species, within a predictive framework. At larger geographic domains and scales, protected area network units have spatial geoclimatic properties that can be described in the gap analysis typically used to measure or aggregate the geographic distributions of species (stacked species distribution models, or S-SDM). We extend the use of species distribution modeling techniques in order to model the climate envelope (or "footprint") of individual protected areas within a network of protected areas distributed across the 48 conterminous United States and managed by the US National Park System. In our approach we treat each protected area as the geographic range of a hypothetical endemic species, then use MaxEnt and 5 uncorrelated BioClim variables to model the geographic distribution of the climatic envelope associated with each protected area unit (modeling the geographic area of park units as the range of a species). We describe the individual and aggregated climate envelopes predicted by a large network of 163 protected areas and briefly illustrate how macroecological measures of geodiversity can be derived from our analysis of the landscape ecological context of protected areas. To estimate trajectories of change in the temporal distribution of climatic features within a protected area network, we projected the climate envelopes of protected areas in current conditions onto a dataset of predicted future climatic conditions. Our results suggest that the climate envelopes of some parks may be locally unique or have narrow geographic distributions, and are thus prone to future shifts away from the climatic conditions in these parks in current climates. In other cases, some parks are broadly similar to large geographic regions surrounding the park or have climatic envelopes that may persist into near-term climate change. Larger parks predict larger climatic envelopes, in current conditions, but on average the predicted area of climate envelopes are smaller in our single future conditions scenario. Individual units in a protected area network may vary in the potential for climate adaptation, and adaptive management strategies for the network should account for the landscape contexts of the geodiversity or climate diversity within individual units. Conservation strategies, including maintaining connectivity, assessing the feasibility of assisted migration and other landscape restoration or enhancements can be optimized using analysis methods to assess the spatial properties of protected area networks in biogeographic and macroecological contexts.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures





Similar articles
-
Potential relocation of climatic environments suggests high rates of climate displacement within the North American protection network.Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Aug;23(8):3219-3230. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13663. Epub 2017 Mar 22. Glob Chang Biol. 2017. PMID: 28211141
-
Exposure of U.S. National Parks to land use and climate change 1900-2100.Ecol Appl. 2014 Apr;24(3):484-502. doi: 10.1890/13-0905.1. Ecol Appl. 2014. PMID: 24834735
-
Habitat availability and gene flow influence diverging local population trajectories under scenarios of climate change: a place-based approach.Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Apr;22(4):1572-84. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13189. Epub 2016 Jan 28. Glob Chang Biol. 2016. PMID: 26667878
-
Biogeographic constraints to marine conservation in a changing climate.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018 Oct;1429(1):5-17. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13597. Epub 2018 Feb 7. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018. PMID: 29411385 Review.
-
Rewilding in the face of climate change.Conserv Biol. 2021 Feb;35(1):155-167. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13531. Epub 2020 Jun 1. Conserv Biol. 2021. PMID: 32557877 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Rodriguez JP, Brotons L, Bustamante J, Seoane J. 2007. The application of predictive modelling of species distribution to biodiversity conservation. Diversity and Distributions 13(3): 243–251.
-
- Peterson AT, Sorberon J, Pearson RG, Anderson RP, Martinez-Meyer E, Nakamura M, et al. 2011. Ecological niches and geographic distributions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
-
- Pearson RG, Dawson TP. 2003. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimatic envelope models useful? Global Ecology and Biogeography 12: 361–371.
-
- Scott D, McBoyle G, Schartzentruber M. 2004. Climate change and the distribution of climatic resources for tourism in North America. Climate Research 27: 105–117.
-
- Botkin DB, Saxe H, Araujo MB, Betts R, Bradshaw RHW, Cedhagen T, et al. 2007. Forecasting the effects of global warming on biodiversity. Bioscience 57(3): 227–236.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Molecular Biology Databases
Miscellaneous