Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2017 May;38(5):999-1005.
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5103. Epub 2017 Mar 16.

Selective-versus-Standard Poststent Dilation for Carotid Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Selective-versus-Standard Poststent Dilation for Carotid Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

O Petr et al. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 May.

Abstract

Backround: The safety and efficacy of standard poststent angioplasty in patients undergoing carotid artery stent placement have not been well-established.

Purpose: We conducted a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the safety and efficacy of carotid artery stent placement and analyzed outcomes of standard-versus-selective poststent angioplasty.

Data sources: A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Web of Science was performed for studies published between January 2000 and January 2015.

Study selection: We included studies with >30 patients describing standard or selective poststent angioplasty during carotid artery stent placement.

Data analysis: A random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool the following outcomes: periprocedural stroke/TIA, procedure-related neurologic/cardiovascular morbidity/mortality, bradycardia/hypotension, long-term stroke at last follow-up, long-term primary patency, and technical success.

Data synthesis: We included 87 studies with 19,684 patients with 20,378 carotid artery stenoses. There was no difference in clinical (P = .49) or angiographic outcomes (P = .93) in carotid artery stent placement treatment with selective or standard poststent balloon angioplasty. Both selective and standard poststent angioplasty groups had a very high technical success of >98% and a low procedure-related mortality of 0.9%. There were no significant differences between both groups in the incidence of restenosis (P = .93) or procedure-related complications (P = .37).

Limitations: No comparison to a patient group without poststent dilation could be performed.

Conclusions: Our meta-analysis demonstrated no significant difference in angiographic and clinical outcomes among series that performed standard poststent angioplasty and those that performed poststent angioplasty in only select patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
A flow diagram describing our comprehensive literature search.

Comment in

  • Reply.
    Petr O, Brinjikji W, Murad MH, Glodny B, Lanzino G. Petr O, et al. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Nov;38(11):E98. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5435. Epub 2017 Oct 19. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017. PMID: 29051206 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
  • Selective Poststent Balloon Angioplasty for Carotid Stenting.
    Pelz DM, Lownie SP. Pelz DM, et al. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Nov;38(11):E97. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5346. Epub 2017 Oct 19. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017. PMID: 29051210 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Poststent ballooning during transcarotid artery revascularization.
    Dakour-Aridi H, Cui CL, Barleben A, Schermerhorn ML, Eldrup-Jorgensen J, Malas MB. Dakour-Aridi H, et al. J Vasc Surg. 2021 Jun;73(6):2041-2049.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.10.071. Epub 2020 Nov 27. J Vasc Surg. 2021. PMID: 33253868 Free PMC article.
  • Reply.
    Petr O, Brinjikji W, Murad MH, Glodny B, Lanzino G. Petr O, et al. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Nov;38(11):E98. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5435. Epub 2017 Oct 19. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017. PMID: 29051206 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
  • Selective Poststent Balloon Angioplasty for Carotid Stenting.
    Pelz DM, Lownie SP. Pelz DM, et al. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Nov;38(11):E97. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5346. Epub 2017 Oct 19. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017. PMID: 29051210 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Ricotta JJ 2nd, Piazza M. Carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting? Matching the patient to the intervention. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 2010;22:124–36 10.1177/1531003510381136 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ederle J, Bonati LH, Dobson J, et al. ; CAVATAS Investigators. Endovascular treatment with angioplasty or stenting versus endarterectomy in patients with carotid artery stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): long-term follow-up of a randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:898–907 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70228-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ederle J, Dobson J, Featherstone RL, et al. ; International Carotid Stenting Study investigators. Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010;375:985–97 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60239-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE, et al. ; Stenting and Angioplasty with Protection in Patients at High Risk for Endarterectomy Investigators. Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1493–501 10.1056/NEJMoa040127 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brott TG, Hobson RW 2nd, Howard G, et al. ; CREST Investigators. Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 2010;363:11–23 10.1056/NEJMoa0912321 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources