A randomized comparison of modified subcutaneous "Z"-stitch versus manual compression to achieve hemostasis after large caliber femoral venous sheath removal
- PMID: 28303670
- DOI: 10.1002/ccd.27003
A randomized comparison of modified subcutaneous "Z"-stitch versus manual compression to achieve hemostasis after large caliber femoral venous sheath removal
Abstract
Objectives: To compare subcutaneous "Z"-stitch versus manual compression in attaining hemostasis after large bore femoral venous access, and to assess its impact on venous patency.
Background: Structural interventions increasingly require large caliber venous access, for which convenient, safe, and effective method of postprocedural hemostasis is needed. "Z"-stitch has been introduced for this purpose in some centers but systematic data on its performance is limited.
Methods: This single center study randomized consecutive patients with femoral venous access sites requiring ≥10F sheaths to the "Z"-stitch or manual compression for hemostasis in a 2:1 fashion. There were three co-primary endpoints: time to hemostasis, time to ambulation, and a composite safety endpoint comprising vascular access site complications. Groin Doppler-Duplex was performed with the stitch in place and after its removal.
Results: 86 consecutive patients with 90 access sites were randomized. Mean age was 61.7 ± 19.1 years, 33.3% were men. Median sheath size was 14 F (range 10-22 F). Patients randomized to "Z"-stitch achieved hemostasis quicker [<1 min vs. 12.0 (IQR 10.0-15.0) min, P < 0.001] and ambulated sooner [7.0 (IQR 4.0-12.0) vs. 16.0 (IQR 11.8-20.3) hr post procedure, P < 0.001] when compared with manual compression alone. The "Z"-stitch reduced rates of access site complications (OR = 0.27, 95%CI 0.09-0.76, P = 0.01). All imaged veins were patent before and after stitch removal.
Conclusions: The "Z"-stitch is a safe and effective method of achieving hemostasis after large bore femoral venous sheath removal and results in faster hemostasis, early patient ambulation and less access site complications, without compromising vein patency when compared with manual compression alone. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Keywords: bleeding; complications; structural heart disease intervention; vascular access.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Comment in
-
Venous access closure: From A to Z.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan 1;91(1):113-114. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27449. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018. PMID: 29314642
Similar articles
-
Hemostatic Wound Dressing for Postinterventional Hemostasis in Large Femoral Artery Access Sites: An Initial Efficacy and Safety Study.J Endovasc Ther. 2016 Oct;23(5):744-50. doi: 10.1177/1526602816658029. Epub 2016 Jul 5. J Endovasc Ther. 2016. PMID: 27385152
-
Purse string suture for rapid access hemostasis after removal of large-caliber femoral venous delivery sheaths in children with atrial septal defects.BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Jan 15;25(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04490-5. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025. PMID: 39819307 Free PMC article.
-
The fellows stitch: large caliber venous hemostasis in pediatric practice.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Jul 1;80(1):79-82. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23406. Epub 2011 Dec 1. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012. PMID: 22105903
-
Comparison of manual compression and vascular hemostasis devices after coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention through femoral artery access: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Mar;19(2):151-162. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.08.009. Epub 2017 Aug 19. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018. PMID: 28941744
-
Femoral Large Bore Sheath Management: How to Prevent Vascular Complications From Vessel Puncture to Sheath Removal.Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Sep;17(9):e014156. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014156. Epub 2024 Aug 21. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024. PMID: 39166330 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
ZEBRA study: The Z stitch Early Bed Rest Assessment study.Heart Rhythm O2. 2024 Jun 7;5(7):468-473. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.06.002. eCollection 2024 Jul. Heart Rhythm O2. 2024. PMID: 39119024 Free PMC article.
-
Torque device suture technique to achieve hemostasis in large-bore venous access.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Mar 1;95(4):722-725. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28657. Epub 2019 Dec 18. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020. PMID: 31854083 Free PMC article.
-
Vascular Access and Closure Management for Electrophysiological Interventions: Small Interventions Big Impact.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2025 Jan 22;27(1):35. doi: 10.1007/s11886-024-02156-w. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2025. PMID: 39841329 Review.
-
A Novel Suture-Based Vascular Closure Device to Achieve Hemostasis after Venous or Arterial Access While Leaving Nothing behind: A Review of the Technological Assessment and Early Clinical Outcomes.J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 7;13(16):4606. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164606. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39200748 Free PMC article. Review.
-
2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: Executive summary.Heart Rhythm. 2020 Jan;17(1):e155-e205. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.03.014. Epub 2019 May 10. Heart Rhythm. 2020. PMID: 31102616 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical