Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1995 Sep;104(1):1-11.
doi: 10.1007/BF00365555.

Host plant influence on chemical defense in conifer sawflies (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae)

Affiliations

Host plant influence on chemical defense in conifer sawflies (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae)

S G Codella Jr et al. Oecologia. 1995 Sep.

Abstract

Host diet affects the defensive efficacy of Neodiprion sawflies. In laboratory assays with wood ants (Formica obscuripes), secretions from larvae reared on Pinus banksiana were the most repellent, while those from P. resinosa feeders were the least so. This was explained diterpene resin acid content, but not total monoterpene content. The terpene content of regurgitant generally reflected dietary concentrations. Compounds were sequestered nonselectively by larvae. Host-based differences in defense persisted at the behavioral level. P. banksiana feeders regurgitated greater volumes of fluid and were less likely to be disabled or killed by ants in one-on-one interactions than were larvae fed on P. resinosa. The defensive advantages of host diet conflicted with developmental requirements. N. sertifer reared on P. banksiana (the best diet for defense in all cases) had lower cocoon weights (a correlate of fecundity) than those reared on other diets, and had prolonged larval development compared to insects fed P. sylvestris. No such tradeoff was detected in N. lecontei. Larvae of both species strongly preferred P. banksiana over P. resinosa in feeding choice assays.

Keywords: Antipredator; Formica; Neodiprion; Pinus; Tradeoffs.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Oecologia. 1995 Jul;103(1):24-33 - PubMed
    1. J Chem Ecol. 1984 Apr;10(4):601-39 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1973 Mar 16;179(4078):1090-9 - PubMed
    1. J Chem Ecol. 1988 Dec;14(12):2147-68 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1977 Jul 29;197(4302):497-9 - PubMed