Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1979 Jan;44(3):342-346.
doi: 10.1007/BF00545238.

Effects of seed distribution and competitors on seed harvesting efficiency in heteromyid rodents

Affiliations

Effects of seed distribution and competitors on seed harvesting efficiency in heteromyid rodents

Stephen C Trombulak et al. Oecologia. 1979 Jan.

Abstract

The foraging strategies of four naturally co-existing heteromyid rodent species were investigated: Dipodomys deserti (≈100 g), D. merriami (≈38 g), Microdipodops pallidus (≈13 g), and Perognathus longimembris (≈7 g). In 208 over-night laboratory foraging trials animals were provided with millet seed distributed in clumped and scattered patterns. Net removal of seeds from the foraging arena and amounts of seeds in cheek pouches and in caches were determined. When alone in an areana none of these species specialized extensively on either clumped or scattered seeds, although each tended to take more clumped than scattered seeds. When placed together with other individuals, animals once again tended to cache more clumped than scattered seeds in all but one paired combination of species: P. longimembris cached more scattered than clumped seeds when opposed by D. deserti. This suggests that the smaller species obtained a less preferred distribution of seeds in the face of competition. The two smaller species showed a great reduction in general foraging success in the presence of either of the two larger species. In general, a species cached less seeds when faced by larger opponent species.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Oecologia. 1977 Sep;30(3):285-294 - PubMed
    1. Oecologia. 1978 Jan;33(2):127-135 - PubMed
    1. Oecologia. 1978 Jan;35(1):13-19 - PubMed
    1. Oecologia. 1978 Jan;33(1):115-126 - PubMed
    1. Oecologia. 1975 Mar;19(1):9-28 - PubMed