Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1983 Jun;58(3):314-319.
doi: 10.1007/BF00385229.

Effects of light regime on the growth, leaf morphology, and water relations of seedlings of two species of tropical trees

Affiliations

Effects of light regime on the growth, leaf morphology, and water relations of seedlings of two species of tropical trees

Ned Fetcher et al. Oecologia. 1983 Jun.

Abstract

An experiment was conducted with Heliocarpus appendiculatus, a pioneer or large gap species of tropical moist forest in Costa Rica, and Dipteryx panamensis, a small gap species. Seedlings were grown in full sun, partial (80%) shade, and full (98%) shade. After one month of growth they were switched between environments and grown for two more months.Growth in height of Heliocarpus was greatly affected by irradiance, being increased in response to full shade and decreased in full sun. Height of Dipteryx was unaffected by irradiance level. Survival of Heliocarpus seedlings was only 49% in full shade, whereas Dipteryx had 100% survival. Biomass of Heliocarpus was not significantly greater in full sun than in partial shade whereas it was for Dipteryx. The response of root: shoot ratio was similar for both species. They were lowest in full shade and highest in full sun. Heliocarpus exhibited greater changes in leaf thickness, specific leaf weight, and stomatal density than did Dipteryx. Stomatal conductance of both species was lower in full shade and full sun than in partial shade.The results of the experiment indicate that growth of Heliocarpus is more plastic than that of Dipteryx in response to changes in irradiance. Previous environment did not affect the response to the present environment in either species. Both species responded positively to increases in irradiance.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Plant Physiol. 1969 Jun;44(6):881-5 - PubMed
    1. Oecologia. 1974 Jun;17 (2):159-170 - PubMed
    1. Oecologia. 1980 Jan;45(3):331-340 - PubMed
    1. Oecologia. 1982 Sep;54(3):313-316 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources