Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1985 Jun;66(3):381-386.
doi: 10.1007/BF00378303.

Nectar uptake rates and optimal nectar concentrations of two butterfly species

Affiliations

Nectar uptake rates and optimal nectar concentrations of two butterfly species

P G May. Oecologia. 1985 Jun.

Abstract

The relationship between sucrose concentration of nectar and volume uptake rate by the butterflies Agraulis vanillae (Nymphalidae) and Phoebis sennae (Pieridae) was examined. Recent theoretical models simulating feeding energetics of nectarivores have assumed that this volume uptake rate is produced by a constant but undetermined pressure drop (the difference between pressure at the proximal and distal ends of the feeding channel) at all nectar concentrations. These models predict that nectar of 20-25% sucrose maximizes the rate of energy intake and should thus be preferred by nectarivores. Data collected for Agraulis and Phoebis falsify this pressure drop assumption; both species produce greater pressure drops with increasing nectar concentration. In addition, males of both species produce greater suction pressure and uptake rates than females. This results in greater rates of energy intake for males of both species. The volume uptake rates produced by each species differ from those predicted by the models. This produces a maximal rate of energy intake at 35-40% sucrose rather than 20-25%. The empirically determined relationship between energy intake rate and nectar concentration esembles that predicted for discontinuous nectar feeders such as hummingbirds more closely than the relationship predicted for continuous suction feeders, suggesting that other basic assumptions about the feeding mechanism of butterflies should be critically examined.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Oecologia. 1974 Dec;14(4):353-374 - PubMed
    1. Oecologia. 1983 Nov;60(2):198-213 - PubMed
    1. Oecologia. 1983 Nov;60(2):214-226 - PubMed
    1. J Theor Biol. 1979 Jan 21;76(2):167-79 - PubMed