Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1989 Dec;81(4):437-442.
doi: 10.1007/BF00378949.

The effects of the spatial pattern of defoliation on regrowth of a tussock grass : II. Canopy gas exchange

W G Gold  1 , M M Caldwell  1
Affiliations

The effects of the spatial pattern of defoliation on regrowth of a tussock grass : II. Canopy gas exchange

W G Gold et al. Oecologia. 1989 Dec.

Abstract

The effect of different defoliation, patterns within a tussock grass on CO2 and water vapor exchange of entire tussocks was assessed and compared with differences in regrowth behavior. During rapid spring growth, 60% of the green foliage area was removed from Agropyron desertorum tussocks in different spatial patterns. Compensatory growth responses of defoliated tussocks corresponded well with increases in integrated daytime CO2 exchange rate of tussocks per unit foliage area (CERd) immediately following clipping. When leaves were removed from low in the tussock (older leaves), both regrowth and CERd were greater than after removal of foliage located high in the canopy (younger leaves). Water vapor conductance (gw) increased similarly for all clipped plants, regardless of defoliation pattern. Thus, the differential responses of CERd to the defoliation patterns could not be fully attributed to changes in gw. The increases in gw of all clipped plants resulted in large increses in tussock daytime water loss (Ed) and decreases in tussock water-use efficiency (CERd/Ed), even in the case where mostly older, shaded foliage was removed. Despite increases in CERd, whole-tussock CO2 fixation (net CO2 exchange per tussock) declined immediately after clipping because of the removal of considerable foliage. Whole-tussock CO2 uptake recovered more rapidly in tussocks which had lower leaf blades removed than in tussocks which had upper foliage removed because of differences in the rate of new foliage production.

Keywords: Clipping; Defoliation; Gas exchange; Regrowth; Tussock grass.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Oecologia. 1984 Sep;64(1):21-25 - PubMed
    1. Planta. 1981 Dec;153(4):376-87 - PubMed
    1. Oecologia. 1983 Sep;59(2-3):178-184 - PubMed
    1. Oecologia. 1989 Aug;80(3):289-296 - PubMed
    1. Oecologia. 1983 Mar;57(1-2):14-19 - PubMed