Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1994 Jun;98(1):15-24.
doi: 10.1007/BF00326085.

Meat ants as dominant members of Australian ant communities: an experimental test of their influence on the foraging success and forager abundance of other species

Affiliations

Meat ants as dominant members of Australian ant communities: an experimental test of their influence on the foraging success and forager abundance of other species

A N Andersen et al. Oecologia. 1994 Jun.

Abstract

Meat ants (Iridomyrmex purpureus and allies) are perceived to be dominant members of Australian ant communities because of their great abundance, high rates of activity, and extreme aggressiveness. Here we describe the first experimental test of their influence on other ant species, and one of the first experimental studies of the influence of a dominant species on any diverse ant community. The study was conducted at a 0.4 ha savanna woodland site in the seasonal tropics of northern Australia, where the northern meat ant (I. sanguineus) represented 41% of pitfall catches and 73% of all ants at tuna baits, despite a total of 74 species being recorded. Meat ants were fenced out of experimental plots in order to test their influence on the foraging success of other species, as measured by access to tuna baits. The numbers of all other ants and ant species at baits in exclusion plots were approximately double those in controls (controlling for both the fences and for meat ant abundance), and returned rapidly to control levels when fences were removed after 7 weeks. Individual species differend markedly in their response to the fencing treatment, with species of Camponotus and Monomorium showing the strongest responses. Fencing had no effect on pitfall catches of species other than the meat ant, indicating that the effect of meat ants at baits was directly due to interference with foraging workers, and not regulation of general forager abundance. Such interference by meat ants has important implications for the sizes and densities of colonies of other ant species, and ultimately on overall ant community structure.

Keywords: Ant community structure; Exclusion experiment; Foraging success; Interference competition; Tridomyrmex sanguineus.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Oecologia. 1986 Apr;69(1):12-15 - PubMed
    1. Oecologia. 1991 Oct;88(2):157-160 - PubMed
    1. Oecologia. 1988 Feb;75(1):114-118 - PubMed
    1. Am Nat. 1992 Sep;140(3):401-20 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1978 Mar 24;199(4335):1302-10 - PubMed