Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1991 Jun;87(1):43-50.
doi: 10.1007/BF00323778.

Demographic costs of Chaoborus-induced defences in Daphnia pulex: a sensitivity analysis

Affiliations

Demographic costs of Chaoborus-induced defences in Daphnia pulex: a sensitivity analysis

Mari Walls et al. Oecologia. 1991 Jun.

Abstract

We examined the demographic costs of Chaoborus-induced defensive spine structures in Daphnia pulex. Our aim was to assess the role of resource limitation and the interaction effects of limiting food level and antipredator structures on fitness of D. pulex and to pinpoint those life stages that are most sensitive to changes in the defence regime. Chaoborus-induced and typical morphotypes of D. pulex were reared at high and low food concentrations. Instar-based matrix population models were used to quantify the effects of predator-induction, food and their interaction on fitness of D. pulex. Predator-induction caused a statistically significant reduction in fitness at low food levels, but not at high food levels. Sensitivity analyses revealed that the fitness effects were primarily due to changes in the growth rate in instars 1-5, and secondarily to small reductions in the fertility of instars 5-10. The interaction between Chaoborus exposure and low food concentration was negative, and mediated through growth and fertility components. Both these components were reduced more in the Chaoborus-exposed, low food treatment than would be expected in the absence of interaction.

Keywords: Chaoborus; Daphnia pulex; Inducible defence; Population growth; Predator-prey interaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Oecologia. 1990 May;83(1):117-122 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1985 Nov 22;230(4728):895-9 - PubMed
    1. Oecologia. 1989 Mar;78(3):361-367 - PubMed
    1. Trends Ecol Evol. 1988 Feb;3(2):45-9 - PubMed
    1. Q Rev Biol. 1990 Sep;65(3):323-40 - PubMed