Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1992 Oct;91(4):468-473.
doi: 10.1007/BF00650318.

Ants andPolyommatus icarus immatures (Lycaenidae) -sex-related developmental benefits and costs of ant attendance

Affiliations

Ants andPolyommatus icarus immatures (Lycaenidae) -sex-related developmental benefits and costs of ant attendance

Konrad Fiedler et al. Oecologia. 1992 Oct.

Abstract

Third and fourth instar larvae and pupae of the facultatively myrmecophilous Palaearctic blue butterflyPolyommatus icarus showed no alteration in developmental time when reared in the presence of two species ofLasius ants. Sex differences were observed in larval growth and pupal weight, with males growing larger and faster. Sex-related differences also occurred in the costs and benefits of ant-attendance. Male pupal masses tended to be larger in individuals associated with ants, and their pupal weight loss was not enhanced by ant attendance. This positive developmental effect of myrmecophily is tentatively attributed to a stimulating influence of ants on caterpillar feeding behavior. In contrast, females associated with ants tended to lose more weight during the pupal stage. Hence there is evidence for developmental benefits, rather than costs, of myrmecophily in maleP. icarus immatures, whereas ant attendance appears to be more costly for females during the pupal stage. These findings are discussed in relation to data on other myrmecophilous lycaenid species. It is suggested that maintaining low-level myrmecophily and its related organs is a comparatively inexpensive evolutionary stable strategy among this butterfly group.

Keywords: Cost-benefit analysis; Formicidae; Lycaenidae; Mutualism; Myrmecophily.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Oecologia. 1988 Mar;75(2):204-206 - PubMed
    1. Oecologia. 1975 Mar;18(1):17-21 - PubMed
    1. Oecologia. 1989 Oct;81(2):249-257 - PubMed
    1. Oecologia. 1990 Jun;83(2):284-7 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1981 Mar 13;211(4487):1185-7 - PubMed