Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2017 May;402(3):493-500.
doi: 10.1007/s00423-017-1574-9. Epub 2017 Mar 17.

Comparison of two- and three-dimensional display for performance of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of two- and three-dimensional display for performance of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Shingo Kanaji et al. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 May.

Abstract

Purpose: Introduction of three-dimensional (3D) display might remove technical obstacles of laparoscopic surgery and improve laparoscopic skills. We analyzed the effect of 3D technology on operative performance during laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for gastric cancer and assessed its advantages over two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopy.

Methods: This study included 30 consecutive surgeries of LTG with esophagojejunostomy by the overlap method performed (3D group, n = 15, 2D group, n = 15). The surgical outcomes were compared between the 3D and 2D groups. Further, we compared the performance time, the frequency of bleeding requiring hemostasis, and the frequency of remaking the surgical view by the assistant's forceps in each laparoscopic scene between the 3D and 2D groups.

Results: All surgeries were completed without any complications. The total time of pure laparoscopic scenes was shorter in the 3D than 2D group (154.2 vs. 182.7 min, P = 0.026), and total blood loss was almost the same (10 vs. 20 g, P = 0.195). The operative time during lymphadenectomy in scenes 6 and 7 were significantly shorter in the 3D than the 2D group (scene 6, 13.5 vs. 17.5 min, P = 0.003, and scene 7, 12.4 vs. 18.4, P = 0.025) and esophagojejunostomy (30.3 vs. 39.4 min, P = 0.008). The frequency of tissue exposure by the assistant was significantly less in the 3D group than the 2D group in scenes 6 and 7 (scene 6, n = 3.0 vs. 4.0, P = 0.006, and scene 7, n = 3.0 vs. 4.0, P = 0.017).

Conclusions: 3D display is useful due to improvement of surgical skill during difficult situations such as lymphadenectomy around the celiac artery, which requires handling in the tangential view, and reconstruction using the suturing technique in a narrow space.

Keywords: 2D laparoscopy; 3D laparoscopy; Esophagojejunostomy by the overlap method; Gastric cancer; Laparoscopic total gastrectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Surg Endosc. 2016 Jan;30(1):147-53 - PubMed
    1. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Feb;402(1):167-171 - PubMed
    1. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2011 Aug;4(3):112-5 - PubMed
    1. Gastric Cancer. 2011 Jun;14(2):113-23 - PubMed
    1. Br J Surg. 2015 Nov;102(12):1500-5 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources