Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug;45(6):877-890.
doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0702-7.

Do actions speak louder than words? Examining children's ability to follow instructions

Affiliations

Do actions speak louder than words? Examining children's ability to follow instructions

Amanda H Waterman et al. Mem Cognit. 2017 Aug.

Abstract

The ability to encode, retain, and implement instructions within working memory is central to many behaviours, including classroom activities which underpin learning. The three experiments presented here explored how action-planned, enacted, and observed-impacted 6- to 10-year-old's ability to follow instructions. Experiment 1 (N = 81) found enacted recall was superior to verbal recall, but self-enactment at encoding had a negative effect on enacted recall and verbal recall. In contrast, observation of other-enactment (demonstration) at encoding facilitated both types of recall (Experiment 2a: N = 81). Further, reducing task demands through a reduced set of possible actions (Experiment 2b; N = 64) led to a positive effect of self-enactment at encoding for later recall (both verbal and enacted). Expecting to enact at recall may lead to the creation of an imaginal spatial-motoric plan at encoding that boosts later recall. However, children's ability to use the additional spatial-motoric codes generated via self-enactment at encoding depends on the demands the task places on central executive resources. Demonstration at encoding appears to reduce executive demands and enable use of these additional forms of coding.

Keywords: Enactment; Learning; Working memory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic task diagram showing a sequence of three action-object pairs
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean number of action-object pairs correctly recalled (with standard error) for Experiment 1
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean number of action-object pairs correctly recalled (with standard error) for Experiment 2a
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Mean number of action-object pairs correctly recalled (with standard error) for Experiment 2b

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allen RJ, Waterman AH. How does enactment affect the ability to follow instructions in working memory? Memory & Cognition. 2015;43(3):555–561. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0481-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allen RJ, Havelka J, Falcon T, Evans S, Darling S. Modality specificity and integration in working memory: Insights from visuospatial bootstrapping. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 2015;41(3):820–830. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000058. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alloway TP. Working memory, reading, and mathematical skills in children with developmental coordination disorder. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2007;96(1):20–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2006.07.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alloway TP, Gathercole SE. Short-term and working memory impairments in neurodevelopmental disorders: Diagnosis and remedial support. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines. 2006;47(1):4–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01446.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alloway TP, Gathercole SE, Pickering SJ. Verbal and visuospatial short-term and working memory in children: Are they separable? Child Development. 2006;77(6):1698–716. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00968.x. - DOI - PubMed