Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Oct;26(5):971-979.
doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0074-y. Epub 2017 Mar 17.

Reasons for Declining Preconception Expanded Carrier Screening Using Genome Sequencing

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Reasons for Declining Preconception Expanded Carrier Screening Using Genome Sequencing

Marian J Gilmore et al. J Genet Couns. 2017 Oct.

Abstract

Genomic carrier screening can identify more disease-associated variants than existing carrier screening methodologies, but its utility from patients' perspective is not yet established. A randomized controlled trial for preconception genomic carrier screening provided an opportunity to understand patients' decisions about whether to accept or decline testing. We administered a survey to potential genomic carrier screening recipients who declined participation (N = 240) to evaluate their reasons for doing so. Two thirds of women declined participation. We identified major themes describing reasons these individuals declined to participate; the most common were time limitation, lack of interest, not wanting to know the information, and potential cause of worry or anxiety. Most women eligible for genomic carrier screening indicated that their reasons for opting out were due to logistical issues rather than opposing the rationale for testing. As expanded carrier screening and genomic sequencing become a more routine part of clinical care, it is anticipated there will be variable uptake from individuals for this testing. Thus, the advancement of clinical carrier screening from single genes, to expanded screening panels, to an exome- or genome-wide platform, will require approaches that respect individual choice to receive genetic testing for reproductive risk assessment.

Keywords: Declining genetic testing; Genome sequencing; Genomic medicine; Patient testing decisions; Preconception expanded carrier screening; Qualitative research; Reproductive decisions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Marian J. Gilmore, Jennifer Schneider, James V. Davis, Tia L. Kauffman, Michael C. Leo, Kellene Bergen, Jacob A. Reiss, Patricia Himes, Elissa Morris, Carol Young, Carmit McMullen, Benjamin S. Wilfond, and Katrina A.B. Goddard declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart for preconception genomic carrier screening recruitment

References

    1. ACOG Committee on Genetics. ACOG committee opinion Number. Vol. 318. Washington: ACOG; 2005. Oct, 2005. Screening for Tay-Sachs disease.
    1. ACOG Committee on Genetics. ACOG practice bulletin no. 78: hemoglobinopathies in pregnancy. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2007;109(1):229–237. - PubMed
    1. ACOG Committee on Genetics. ACOG committee opinion no. 432: spinal muscular atrophy. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2009a;113(5):1194–1196. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181a6d03a;00006250-200905000-00046. - DOI - PubMed
    1. ACOG Committee on Genetics. ACOG Committee opinion no. 442: preconception and prenatal carrier screening for genetic diseases in individuals of eastern European Jewish descent. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2009b;114(4):950–953. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181bd12f4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. ACOG Committee on Genetics. ACOG Committee opinion no. 469: carrier screening for fragile X syndrome. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2010;116(4):1008–1010. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181fae884. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types