Pancreaticoduodenectomy Can Be Performed Safely with Rare Employment of Surgical Drains

Abstract

Use of drain remains frequent following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) due to concern for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and anastomotic leak development. Despite controversy, a recent randomized trial suggested omitting drainage would result in a large increase in operative mortality. This study sought to comprehensively examine the effects of forgoing drainage in the large cohort of patients undergoing PD. A prospective cohort study of two consecutive groups undergoing PD was constructed. The initial group had operative drains placed in cases subjectively concerning for POPF development; the second cohort did not undergo operative drainage. Outcomes including POPF incidence, need for reintervention, and overall morbidity were examined. A total of 106 patients were evaluated in two consecutive cohorts of 53; in the first group, 30 per cent had operative drains placed; 22.6 per cent developed POPF versus 7.5 per cent of patients in the no drainage group (P = 0.06). Despite this, no significant difference in major morbidity (Clavien ≥3, 20.8% versus 17.0%) or need for procedural reintervention (18.9% versus 15.1%) was observed. A subsequent validation cohort of 237 additional patients where drains were used only in exceptional circumstances was examined. Operative drains were placed in only 3 per cent of patients (n = 7) and 90-day mortality was 1.3 per cent (n = 3). Incidence of POPF was 8.0 per cent and the overall major complication rate was 14.8 per cent. Given such findings, it appears that drainage after PD can be avoided resulting in acceptable operative morbidity and mortality in most cases.