Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug 19;16(3):10.
doi: 10.5334/ijic.2422.

Analysing the Costs of Integrated Care: A Case on Model Selection for Chronic Care Purposes

Affiliations

Analysing the Costs of Integrated Care: A Case on Model Selection for Chronic Care Purposes

Marc Carreras et al. Int J Integr Care. .

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study is to investigate whether the algorithm proposed by Manning and Mullahy, a consolidated health economics procedure, can also be used to estimate individual costs for different groups of healthcare services in the context of integrated care.

Methods: A cross-sectional study focused on the population of the Baix Empordà (Catalonia-Spain) for the year 2012 (N = 92,498 individuals). A set of individual cost models as a function of sex, age and morbidity burden were adjusted and individual healthcare costs were calculated using a retrospective full-costing system. The individual morbidity burden was inferred using the Clinical Risk Groups (CRG) patient classification system.

Results: Depending on the characteristics of the data, and according to the algorithm criteria, the choice of model was a linear model on the log of costs or a generalized linear model with a log link. We checked for goodness of fit, accuracy, linear structure and heteroscedasticity for the models obtained.

Conclusion: The proposed algorithm identified a set of suitable cost models for the distinct groups of services integrated care entails. The individual morbidity burden was found to be indispensable when allocating appropriate resources to targeted individuals.

Keywords: costs and cost analysis; delivery of health care; integrated; risk assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
SSIBE healthcare services.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Manning – Mullahy Algorithm.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Impact of morbidity on resource consumption.

References

    1. Evers S, Paulus A. Health econòmics and integrated care: a growing and challenging relationship. Int J Integr Care. 2015. Apr-Jun. URN:NBN:NL:UI:10-1-114829. Available from: http://www.ijic.org/index.php/ijic/article/view/2201/2987 . - PMC - PubMed
    1. Paulus A, Van Raak A, Maarse H. Is integrated nursing home care cheaper than traditional care? A cost comparison. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2008;45:1764–1777. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.05.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vondeling H. Economic evaluation of integrated care: an introduction. International Journal of Integrated Care. 2004. Mar 1, Available from: http://www.ijic.org/index.php/ijic/article/view/URN%3ANBN%3ANL%3AUI%3A10... . - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mullahy J. Much Ado about two: reconsidering retransformation and the two-part model in health economics. Journal of Health Economics. 1998;17:247–281. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(98)00030-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Manning WG. The logged dependent variable, heteroscedasticity, and the retransformation problem. Journal of Health Economics. 1998;17:283–295. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(98)00025-3. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources