Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2017 Mar;5(3):E222-E223.
doi: 10.1055/s-0043-101689.

NAPS in 2016: why not everywhere?

Affiliations
Editorial

NAPS in 2016: why not everywhere?

Andrea Riphaus. Endosc Int Open. 2017 Mar.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests None

References

    1. McQuaid K R, Laine L. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials of moderate sedation for routine endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:910–923. - PubMed
    1. Dewitt J, McGreevy K, Sherman S et al. Nurse-administered propofol sedation compared with midazolam and meperidine for EUS: a prospective, randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68:499–509. - PubMed
    1. Jung M, Hofmann C, Kiesslich R et al. Improvedsedationindiag- nostic and therapeutic ERCP: propofol is an alternative to midazolam. Endoscopy. 2000;32:233–238. - PubMed
    1. Meining A, Semmler V, Kassem A M et al. The effect of sedation on the quality of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: an investigator-blinded, randomized study comparing propofol with midazolam. Endoscopy. 2007;39:345–349. - PubMed
    1. Singh H, Poluha W, Cheung M et al. Propofol for sedation during colonoscopy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;04 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006268.pub2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types