The incremental benefit of EUS for identifying unresectable disease among adults with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A meta-analysis
- PMID: 28319148
- PMCID: PMC5358870
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173687
The incremental benefit of EUS for identifying unresectable disease among adults with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A meta-analysis
Abstract
Background and study aims: It is unclear to what extent EUS influences the surgical management of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This systematic review sought to determine if EUS evaluation improves the identification of unresectable disease among adults with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Patients and methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, bibliographies of included articles and conference proceedings for studies reporting original data regarding surgical management and/or survival among patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, from inception to January 7th 2017. Our main outcome was the incremental benefit of EUS for the identification of unresectable disease (IBEUS). The pooled IBEUS were calculated using random effects models. Heterogeneity was explored using stratified meta-analysis and meta-regression.
Results: Among 4,903 citations identified, we included 8 cohort studies (study periods from 1992 to 2007) that examined the identification of unresectable disease (n = 795). Random effects meta-analysis suggested that EUS alone identified unresectable disease in 19% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 10-33%). Among those studies that considered portal or mesenteric vein invasion as potentially resectable, EUS alone was able to identify unresectable disease in 14% of patients (95% CI 8-24%) after a CT scan was performed.
Limitations: The majority of the included studies were retrospective.
Conclusions: EUS evaluation is associated with increased identification of unresectable disease among adults with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures



Similar articles
-
The incremental benefit of EUS for the identification of malignancy in indeterminate extrahepatic biliary strictures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Endosc Ultrasound. 2019 Sep-Oct;8(5):310-317. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_24_19. Endosc Ultrasound. 2019. PMID: 31249170 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Contrast-enhanced EUS for differential diagnosis of pancreatic mass lesions: a meta-analysis.Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Aug;76(2):301-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.02.051. Epub 2012 Jun 15. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012. PMID: 22703697
-
EUS diagnosis of vascular invasion in pancreatic cancer: surgical and histologic correlates.Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Jun;100(6):1381-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41675.x. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005. PMID: 15929774
-
Endoscopic ultrasonography complements computed tomography in predicting portal or superior mesenteric vein resection in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic carcinoma.Pancreatology. 2017 Jan-Feb;17(1):130-134. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2016.12.001. Epub 2016 Dec 5. Pancreatology. 2017. PMID: 28043760
-
Endosonographic workup and preoperative biliary drainage for pancreatic cancer.Semin Oncol. 2015 Feb;42(1):59-69. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2014.12.006. Epub 2014 Dec 9. Semin Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25726052 Review.
Cited by
-
Regional differences in use of endoscopic ultrasonography in Ontario: a population-based retrospective cohort study.CMAJ Open. 2017 Jun 7;5(2):E437-E443. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20160153. CMAJ Open. 2017. PMID: 28600449 Free PMC article.
-
The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Pancreatic Cancer Staging in the Era of Neoadjuvant Therapy and Personalised Medicine.GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2021 Feb;28(2):111-120. doi: 10.1159/000509197. Epub 2020 Sep 7. GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2021. PMID: 33791398 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Imaging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma - An update for all stages of patient management.Eur J Radiol Open. 2024 Feb 8;12:100553. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100553. eCollection 2024 Jun. Eur J Radiol Open. 2024. PMID: 38357385 Free PMC article.
-
Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Dec 28;14(1):78. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14010078. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38201387 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The incremental benefit of EUS for the identification of malignancy in indeterminate extrahepatic biliary strictures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Endosc Ultrasound. 2019 Sep-Oct;8(5):310-317. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_24_19. Endosc Ultrasound. 2019. PMID: 31249170 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2016. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2016.
-
- Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Koniaris L, Kaushal S, Abrams RA et al. Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas-616 patients: results, outcomes, and prognostic indicators. J Gastrointest Surg 2000;4:567–79. - PubMed
-
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma 2015.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical